Optical measurement of isolated canine lung filtration coefficients after alloxan infusion

Author:

Klaesner Joseph W.1,Pou N. Adrienne2,Parker Richard E.2,Finney Charlene2,Roselli Robert J.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical Engineering and

2. Center for Pulmonary Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235

Abstract

In this study, lung filtration coefficient ( K fc) was measured in eight isolated canine lung preparations by using three methods: standard gravimetric (Std), blood-corrected gravimetric (BC), and optical. The lungs were held in zone III conditions and were subjected to an average venous pressure increase of 8.79 ± 0.93 (mean ± SD) cmH2O. The permeability of the lungs was increased with an infusion of alloxan (75 mg/kg). The resulting K fc values (in milliliters ⋅ min−1 ⋅ cmH2O−1 ⋅ 100 g dry lung weight−1) measured by using Std and BC gravimetric techniques before vs. after alloxan infusion were statistically different: Std, 0.527 ± 0.290 vs. 1.966 ± 0.283; BC, 0.313 ± 0.290 vs. 1.384 ± 0.290. However, the optical technique did not show any statistical difference between pre- and postinjury with alloxan, 0.280 ± 0.305 vs. 0.483 ± 0.297, respectively. The alloxan injury, quantified by using multiple-indicator techniques, showed an increase in permeability and a corresponding decrease in reflection coefficient for albumin (ςf). Because the optical method measures the product of K fc and ςf, this study shows that albumin should not be used as an intravascular optical filtration marker when permeability is elevated. However, the optical technique, along with another means of measuring K fc (such as BC), can be used to calculate the ςfof a tracer (in this study, ςfof 0.894 at baseline and 0.348 after injury). Another important finding of this study was that the ratio of baseline-to-injury K fc values was not statistically different for Std and BC techniques, indicating that the percent contribution of slow blood-volume increases does not change because of injury.

Publisher

American Physiological Society

Subject

Physiology (medical),Physiology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3