Micropipette and vascular occlusion pressures in isolated lungs of newborn lambs

Author:

Fike C. D.1,Gordon J. B.1,Kaplowitz M. R.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City 84132.

Abstract

We compared measurements made by vascular occlusion, double occlusion, and micropuncture techniques in isolated perfused lungs of 3- to 10-day-old lambs. After adding indomethacin to the perfusate of 16 lungs, we used the micropuncture technique to measure pressures in 20- to 80-microns-diam arterioles (Pa80), 20- to 50-microns-diam venules (Pv20), and 50- to 150-microns-diam venules (Pv150). The vascular occlusion and double occlusion techniques were used in these same lungs to measure inflow occlusion (Pao), outflow occlusion (Pvo), and double occlusion pressures (Pdo). In 14 other lungs without indomethacin added to the perfusate, we measured Pv20 and Pvo before and during alveolar hypoxia and/or before and after the addition of papaverine to the perfusate. In indomethacin-treated lungs, Pao was greater than Pa80, Pvo equaled Pv20 and Pv150, and Pdo was the same as Pa80, Pv20, and Pv150. In lungs without indomethacin treatment, Pvo was less than Pv20 both before and during hypoxia but Pvo equaled Pv20 after papaverine was added to the perfusate. Thus, in indomethacin-treated lungs of newborn lambs, Pao reflected pressure in arteries > 80 microns diam, Pdo reflected pressure between 80-microns-diam arteries and 150-microns-diam veins, and Pvo was similar to pressure in veins both as small as 20 microns diam and as large as 150 microns diam. However, without indomethacin there was a gradient between Pvo and Pv20 both before and during hypoxia but not after vasomotor tone was reduced with papaverine. Thus, the correlation between Pvo and micropuncture pressure in Pv20 and Pv150 was not constant and appeared related to vasomotor tone.

Publisher

American Physiological Society

Subject

Physiology (medical),Physiology

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3