Preliminary evidence that DEXA provides an accurate assessment of body composition

Author:

Kohrt Wendy M.1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110

Abstract

Kohrt, Wendy M. Preliminary evidence that DEXA provides an accurate assessment of body composition. J. Appl. Physiol. 84(1): 372–377, 1998.—It was previously found that dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) underestimated central body fat. The purposes of this study were to determine whether an updated version (enhanced version 5.64) of the analysis program corrected this problem ( experiment 1) and to compare body composition assessed by DEXA and hydrodensitometry (HD) in women ( n= 225) and men ( n = 110) across a 21- to 81-yr age range ( experiment 2). For experiment 1, 10 subjects underwent DEXA procedures in a control condition and with packets of lard positioned over either the thighs or the truncal region. DEXA accurately quantified the additional mass as ∼96% fat, regardless of position. For experiment 2, DEXA yielded higher ( P < 0.001) estimates of fatness than did HD (32.1 ± 12.0 vs. 31.2 ± 10.1%). The mean difference between the two methods was similar in young, middle-aged, and older subjects, but was different in men (HD − DEXA, 1.6 ± 3.4% of body wt) than in women (−2.1 ± 3.8% of body wt). Correcting the density of fat-free mass for variance in the bone mineral fraction of fat-free mass reduced the difference between the methods in men from 1.6 ± 3.4 to −0.7 ± 2.9% but widened it in women from −2.1 ± 3.8 to −3.5 ± 3.4%. A second correction procedure that adjusted for variance in water, protein, and mineral fractions of fat-free mass eliminated the differences in estimates of fat content by DEXA and HD in both men (21.1 ± 9.3 vs. 20.6 ± 8.4%, respectively) and women (37.5 ± 9.3 vs. 36.8 ± 8.0%, respectively). These results provide encouraging, but not definitive, evidence that the assessment of body composition by DEXA is accurate under the specified conditions.

Publisher

American Physiological Society

Subject

Physiology (medical),Physiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3