Affiliation:
1. Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco 94143–0130.
Abstract
It is unclear whether beta-adrenergic agonists or antagonists affect lung liquid and protein exchange by changing pulmonary hemodynamics or microvascular leakiness. In 23 unanesthetized, instrumented sheep with long-term lung lymph fistulas, we assessed the effect of the beta-agonist terbutaline or the beta-antagonists propranolol, nadolol, and atenolol, all infused intravenously, on lung lymph flow under base-line conditions and during the acute lung injury caused by 4 h of venous air embolism. Under base-line conditions, neither beta-stimulation nor blockade had any effect. During air embolism, terbutaline decreased pulmonary vascular resistance and lymph flow by 25%. Propranolol and nadolol (non-selective beta 1,beta 2-antagonists) but not atenolol (selective beta 1-antagonist) also decreased lymph flow by 22% on average. We favor the more conservative (hemodynamic) over the more liberal (altered permeability) explanation for our results. First, beta-stimulation clearly caused vasodilation, which lowered the pulmonary microvascular pressure at the site of injury. beta-blockade caused changes similar to alpha-stimulation (J. Appl. Physiol. 62: 2147–2153, 1987). We therefore interpret the beta-blockade as unmasking pulmonary arterial alpha-receptors stimulated by the air-embolism injury, thus allowing vasoconstriction upstream to the site of injury. We do not believe the explanation of the beta-agent effects requires any modulation of lung microvascular leakiness by beta-adrenergic agents.
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Subject
Physiology (medical),Physiology
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献