Affiliation:
1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242.
Abstract
We studied 50 nonsmoking volunteers, ages 18–35 yr, with no past or present history or physical examination findings of asthma, rhinitis, allergic disease, or recent respiratory infections, to evaluate the usefulness of the methacholine bronchoprovocation challenge (MBPC) as a screening test for asthma. All were skin-test-negative to 29 aeroallergens and had base-line pulmonary function values greater than 80% predicted. Fourteen (28%) subjects had a drop in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 20% or greater at a provocative dose (PD20FEV1) less than or equal to 225 breath units. Moreover, when these subjects were compared with 21 asymptomatic allergic asthmatics, there was significant overlap between the two groups in concentration of methacholine causing this decline in FEV1. A positive MBPC at methacholine concentrations less than or equal to 5 mg/ml was not diagnostic of asthma, and a negative MBPC at methacholine concentrations greater than or equal to 10 mg/ml did not rule out asthma. These data strongly suggest that MBPC should not be used as the sole factor for the diagnosis of clinically significant asthma. A positive MBPC is one indication of the presence of airway hyperresponsiveness and thus is only one of many factors that must be considered in the diagnosis of asthma.
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Subject
Physiology (medical),Physiology
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献