Letters to the Editor

Author:

Caumo Andrea12345,Cobelli Claudio12345

Affiliation:

1. San Raffaele Scientific Institute

2. Milan, Italy

3. Department of Electronics and Informatics

4. University of Padua

5. Padua, Italy

Abstract

The following is an abstract of the article discussed in the subsequent letter: Finegood, Diane T., and Dan Tzur. Reduced glucose effectiveness associated with reduced insulin release: an artifact of the minimal-model method. Am. J. Physiol. 271 ( Endocrinol. Metab. 34): E485–E495, 1996.—We previously demonstrated that minimal model-derived estimates of glucose effectiveness (SG), based on the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (SG FSIGT), were reduced in islet-transplanted or streptozotocin-treated dogs and in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. To ascertain the validity of our observations, we compared SG FSIGT with estimates based on a basal hormone replacement glucose clamp (SG BRCLAMP) and a basal hormone replacement glucose tolerance test (SG BRGTT) in normal control (CNTL, n = 12) and streptozotocin-treated dogs with normal fasting plasma glucose (STZ-Rx, n = 9). SG FSIGT was reduced in STZ-Rx compared with CNTL ( P < 0.05). However, neither SG BRCLAMP nor SG BRGTT was reduced in the STZ-Rx group ( P > 0.05). Comparison of protocols for each subject indicated that SG FSIGT was greater than either SG BRCLAMP or SG BRGTT in control ( P < 0.002) but not in STZ-Rx dogs ( P > 0.1). The relationship of SG FSIGT to insulin secretory function suggests that our previous conclusion that SG FSIGT was reduced in subjects with limited insulin release may be an artifact of the minimal-model method. Our results suggest that caution must be exercised in the interpretation of differences in minimal-model estimates of SG between subject groups with significantly different levels of insulin secretory function.

Publisher

American Physiological Society

Subject

Physiology (medical),Physiology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3