Reflections of Efferent Activity in Rotational Responses of Chinchilla Vestibular Afferents

Abstract

To study presumed efferent-mediated responses, we determined if afferents responded to head rotations that stimulated semicircular canals other than the organ being innervated. To minimize stimulation of an afferent's own canal, its plane was placed nearly orthogonal to the rotation plane. Otolith units were tested in a horizontal head position with the ear placed near the rotation axis to minimize linear forces. Under these circumstances, angular-velocity trapezoids (2-s ramps, 2-s plateau) evoked excitatory responses for both rotation directions. These type III responses were considerably larger in decerebrate than in anesthetized preparations. In addition to their being exclusively excitatory, the responses resembled those obtained with electrical stimulation of efferent pathways in including per-stimulus and more prolonged post-stimulus components and in being larger in irregularly discharging than in regularly discharging units. Responses, which were not seen for rotations <80°/s, grew as velocity increased between 80 and 500°/s but were seldom larger than 20 spikes/s. Complete section of the VIIIth nerve abolished type III responses, leaving conventional afferent responses intact. To study the separate contributions of canals on the two sides, responses were compared when the labyrinths were intact and when the ipsilateral or contralateral horizontal canal was mechanically inactivated. Both sides contributed to the efferent-mediated responses. That afferents could be influenced from the contralateral labyrinth was confirmed with the use of unilateral galvanic currents. Following inactivation, excitatory responses were produced by rotations exciting or inhibiting the intact horizontal canal with the responses resulting from excitatory rotations being much larger. Such a response asymmetry is consistent with a semicircular-canal origin for the type III responses. A similar asymmetry was seen in the post-stimulus responses to contralateral cathodal (excitatory) and anodal (inhibitory) galvanic currents. We conclude that the efferent system receives a sufficiently powerful vestibular input from both the ipsilateral and contralateral labyrinths to affect afferent discharge.