Suppression of NMDA Receptor Function Using Antisense DNA Blocks Ocular Dominance Plasticity While Preserving Visual Responses

Abstract

Roberts, Elizabeth B., M. Alex Meredith, and Ary S. Ramoa. Suppression of NMDA receptor function using antisense DNA blocks ocular dominance plasticity while preserving visual responses. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 1021–1032, 1998. Pioneering work has shown that pharmacological blockade of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor channel reduces ocular dominance plasticity. However, the results also show that doses of NMDA receptor antagonists that have an effect on ocular dominance plasticity profoundly reduce sensory responses and disrupt stimulus selectivity of cortical cells. It is, therefore, not possible to determine whether effects of NMDA receptor blockade on visual plasticity result from a specific role of NMDA receptors or from the reduction in sensory response. We have used an alternate approach to examine this question. We performed knockdown experiments using antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) complementary to mRNA coding the NR1 subunit of the NMDA receptor. After 5 days of antisense, but not sense, ODN treatment NMDA receptor–mediated synaptic transmission was reduced markedly relative to the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor response, as indicated by whole cell patch-clamp recordings in the cortical slice preparation. This suppression of NMDA receptor–mediated currents was due to a selective reduction in the NR1 protein near the injection site relative to the untreated hemisphere in the same animal, as indicated by immunocytochemistry and Western blotting. In contrast, AMPA receptors were not affected by the antisense ODN treatment indicating specificity of effects. Another major effect of this treatment was to decrease ocular dominance plasticity. Ferrets that were monocularly deprived 1 wk during the antisense ODN treatment had ocular dominance histograms similar to those found in untreated, nondeprived animals. In contrast, ferrets treated with sense ODN and monocularly deprived had ocular dominance histograms resembling those of untreated, monocularly deprived animals. The effects on ocular dominance plasticity did not result from a disruption of sensory responses because maximum responses as well as orientation and direction selectivity of cortical cells were not affected by the treatment. In conclusion, the present results show that antisense techniques can accomplish more selective manipulations of cortical function than is possible with traditional pharmacological agents. Use of this approach also provides unambiguous evidence for a specific role of NMDA receptors in visual plasticity.