Human Vestibuloocular Reflex and Its Interactions With Vision and Fixation Distance During Linear and Angular Head Movement

Abstract

Paige, Gary D., Laura Telford, Scott H. Seidman, and Graham R. Barnes. Human vestibuloocular reflex and its interactions with vision and fixation distance during linear and angular head movement. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2391–2404, 1998. The vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) maintains visual image stability by generating eye movements that compensate for both angular (AVOR) and linear (LVOR) head movements, typically in concert with visual following mechanisms. The VORs are generally modulated by the “context” in which head movements are made. Three contextual influences on VOR performance were studied during passive head translations and rotations over a range of frequencies (0.5–4 Hz) that emphasized shifting dynamics in the VORs and visual following, primarily smooth pursuit. First, the dynamic characteristics of head movements themselves (“stimulus context”) influence the VORs. Both the AVOR and LVOR operate with high-pass characteristics relative to a head velocity input, although the cutoff frequency of the AVOR (<0.1 Hz) is far below that of the LVOR (∼1 Hz), and both perform well at high frequencies that exceed, but complement, the capabilities of smooth pursuit. Second, the LVOR and AVOR are modulated by fixation distance, implemented with a signal related to binocular vergence angle (“fixation context”). The effect was quantified by analyzing the response during each trial as a linear relationship between LVOR sensitivity (in deg/cm), or AVOR gain, and vergence (in m−1) to yield a slope (vergence influence) and an intercept (response at 0 vergence). Fixation distance (vergence) was modulated by presenting targets at different distances. The response slope rises with increasing frequency, but much more so for the LVOR than the AVOR, and reflects a positive relationship for all but the lowest stimulus frequencies in the AVOR. A third influence is the context of real and imagined targets on the VORs (“visual context”). This was studied in two ways—when targets were either earth-fixed to allow visual enhancement of the VOR or head-fixed to permit visual suppression. The VORs were assessed by extinguishing targets for brief periods while subjects continued to “fixate” them in darkness. The influences of real and imagined targets were most robust at lower frequencies, declining as stimulus frequency increased. The effects were nearly gone at 4 Hz. These properties were equivalent for the LVOR and AVOR and imply that the influences of real and imagined targets on the VORs generally follow low-pass and pursuit-like dynamics. The influence of imagined targets accounts for roughly one-third of the influence of real targets on the VORs at 0.5 Hz.