Endothelial nitric oxide synthase-deficient mice exhibit increased susceptibility to endotoxin-induced acute renal failure

Author:

Wang Wei,Mitra Amit,Poole Brian,Falk Sandor,Lucia M. Scott,Tayal Shalini,Schrier Robert

Abstract

Acute renal failure (ARF) in septic patients drastically increases the mortality to 50–80%. Nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to be increased in sepsis. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is one of the major regulators of arterial blood pressure and regional blood flow; however, its in vivo role in septic ARF is still unclear. We hypothesized that eNOS affords a protective effect against the renal vasoconstriction during endotoxemia. Because there are no specific inhibitors for eNOS, the study was therefore undertaken in eNOS knockout mice. There was no significant difference in baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between the wild-type mice and the eNOS knockout mice (140 ± 10 vs. 157 ± 18 μl/min, n = 9, P = not significant). However, renal blood flow (RBF) was significantly decreased in eNOS knockout mice compared with the wild-type controls (0.62 ± 0.05 ml/min, n = 6 vs. 0.98 ± 0.13 ml/min, n = 8, P < 0.05). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was significantly higher in eNOS knockout mice than the wild-type controls (109 ± 5 vs. 80 ± 1 mmHg, n = 10, P < 0.01). Thus renal vascular resistance (RVR) was much higher in eNOS knockout mice than in the wild-type mice (176 ± 2, n = 6 vs. 82 ± 1 mmHg·ml−1·min−1, n = 8, P < 0.01). When 1.0 mg/kg LPS was injected, there was no change in MAP in either the wild-type (84 ± 3 mmHg, n = 10) or the eNOS knockout mice (105 ± 5 mmHg, n = 10). Although GFR (154 ± 22 μl/min, n = 8) and RBF (1.19 ± 0.05 ml/min, n = 9) remained unchanged with the 1.0-mg/kg dose of LPS in the wild-type mice, GFR (83 ± 18 vs. 140 ± 10 μl/min, n = 6, P < 0.01) and RBF (0.36 ± 0.04 vs. 0.62 ± 0.05 ml/min, n = 6, P < 0.01) decreased significantly in the eNOS knockout mice. Fractional excretion of sodium increased significantly in eNOS knockout mice during endotoxemia (3.61 ± 0.78, n = 7 vs. 0.95 ± 0.14, n = 6, P < 0.01), whereas it remained unchanged in the wild-type mice (0.59 ± 0.16, n = 9 vs. 0.42 ± 0.05, n = 6, P = not significant). In summary, eNOS knockout mice have increased RVR and are more susceptible to endotoxemic ARF than wild-type mice despite higher MAP.

Publisher

American Physiological Society

Subject

Physiology

Cited by 67 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3