Predictors of oronasal breathing among obstructive sleep apnea patients and controls

Author:

Nascimento Juliana A.12,Genta Pedro R.2,Fernandes Paulo H.S.2,Barroso Lucia P.3,Carvalho Tômas S.12,Moriya Henrique T.4ORCID,Madeiro Fernanda2,Lorenzi-Filho Geraldo2,Nakagawa Naomi Kondo12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physiotherapy, LIM-54, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

2. Sleep Laboratory, Pulmonary Division, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

3. Departament of Statistics, Instituto de Matemática e Estatística da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

4. Biomedical Engineering Laboratory, Telecommunication and Control Engineering Department, Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

Oronasal breathing may adversely impact obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients either by increasing upper airway collapsibility or by influencing continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment outcomes. Predicting a preferential breathing route would be helpful to guide CPAP interface prescription. We hypothesized that anthropometric measurements but not self-reported oronasal breathing are predictors of objectively measured oronasal breathing. Seventeen OSA patients and nine healthy subjects underwent overnight polysomnography with an oronasal mask with two sealed compartments attached to independent pneumotacographs. Subjects answered questionnaires about nasal symptoms and perceived breathing route. Oronasal breathing was more common ( P = <0.001) among OSA patients than controls while awake (62 ± 44 vs. 5 ± 6%) and during sleep (59 ± 39 vs. 25 ± 21%, respectively). Oronasal breathing was associated with OSA severity ( P = 0.009), age ( P = 0.005), body mass index ( P = 0.044), and neck circumference ( P = 0.004). There was no agreement between objective measurement and self-reported breathing route among OSA patients while awake (κ = −0.12) and asleep (κ = −0.02). The breathing route remained unchanged after 92% of obstructive apneas. These results suggest that oronasal breathing is more common among OSA patients than controls during both wakefulness and sleep and is associated with OSA severity and anthropometric measures. Self-reporting is not a reliable predictor of oronasal breathing and should not be considered an indication for oronasal CPAP. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) interface choice for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients is often guided by nasal symptoms and self-reported breathing route. We showed that oronasal breathing can be predicted by anthropometric measurements and OSA severity but not by self-reported oronasal breathing. Self-reported breathing and nasal symptoms should not be considered for CPAP interface choice.

Publisher

American Physiological Society

Subject

Physiology (medical),Physiology

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Mask fitting and machine setups;Principles and Practice of Sleep Telemedicine;2025

2. Measurement of respiratory–swallowing coordination using an oronasal facemask in healthy individuals;Experimental Physiology;2024-09-12

3. Correlation between Subjective Nasal Patency and Nasal Capacity in Young Adults: A Pilot Study with a Prototype Device—A Nasoorospirometer;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2024-04-24

4. ONEI: Unveiling Route and Phase of Breathing from Snoring Sounds;Communications in Computer and Information Science;2023-11-26

5. When It’s Not a Good Fit;Annals of the American Thoracic Society;2023-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3