Separate and combined influences of heat and hypobaric hypoxia on self-paced aerobic exercise performance

Abstract

Heat and hypobaric hypoxia independently compromise exercise performance; however, their combined impact on exercise performance has yet to be quantified. This study examined the effects of heat, hypobaric hypoxia, and the combination of these environments on self-paced cycling time trial (TT) performance. Twelve subjects [2 female, 10 male; sea level (SL) peak oxygen consumption (V̇o2peak), 41.5 ± 4.4 mL·kg−1·min−1, mean ± SD] completed 30 min of steady-state cycling exercise (50% SL V̇o2peak), followed by a 15-min self-paced TT in four environmental conditions: SL thermoneutral [SLTN; 250 m, 20°C, 30–50% relative humidity (rh)], SL hot (SLH; 250 m, 35°C, 30% rh), hypobaric hypoxia thermoneutral (HTN; 3,000 m, 20°C, 30–50% rh), and hypobaric hypoxia hot (HH; 3,000 m, 35°C, 30% rh). Performance was assessed by the total work (kJ) completed. TT performance was lower ( P < 0.05) in SLH, HTN, and HH relative to SLTN (−15.4 ± 9.7, −24.1 ± 16.2, and −33.1 ± 13.4 kJ, respectively). Additionally, the total work completed in HTN and HH was lower ( P < 0.05) than that in SLH. In SLH, HTN, and HH, work rate was reduced versus SLTN ( P < 0.05) within the first 3 min of exercise and was consistent for the remainder of the bout. No differences ( P > 0.05) existed for heart rate or Ratings of Perceived Exertion at the end of exercise among conditions. The decrease in self-paced TT performance in the heat and/or hypobaric hypoxia conditions compared with SLTN conditions resulted from a nearly immediate reduction in work rate that may have been regulated by environmentally induced changes in physiological strain and perception of effort in response to TT exercise. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first known study to examine the combined effects of heat and hypobaric hypoxia on short-duration self-paced cycling time trial performance. Regardless of environmental condition, subjects utilized an even work rate for the entire duration of the time trial. The presence of both environmental stressors led to a greater performance impairment than heat or hypobaric hypoxia alone, and the performance decrement stemmed from an early reduction of work rate.