Human muscle protein turnover—why is it so variable?

Author:

Smith Gordon I.1,Patterson Bruce W.1,Mittendorfer Bettina1

Affiliation:

1. Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Abstract

We undertook a comprehensive review of the literature to unravel the nature of the variability in the reported rate of human muscle protein synthesis. We analyzed the results from studies that report the protein fractional synthesis rate (FSR) in the vastus lateralis in healthy, nonobese, untrained adults ≤50 yr of age in the postabsorptive state at rest by using the primed, constant tracer amino acid infusion method according to experimental design characteristics. We hypothesized that if the variability is methodological (rather than physiological) in nature, systematic clustering of FSR values would be evident, and outliers would become apparent. Overall, as expected, the mixed muscle protein FSR values were significantly ( P < 0.001) greater when the muscle vs. the plasma free amino acid enrichment is used as the surrogate precursor pool enrichment, and the average mixed muscle protein FSR values were significantly greater ( P = 0.05) than the myofibrillar/myosin heavy chain FSR values. The within-study variability (i.e., population variance) was somewhat smaller in studies that used plasma amino acid/ketoacid enrichments vs. muscle free amino acid enrichment (∼24 vs. ∼31%), but this was not apparent in all circumstances. Furthermore, the between-study consistency of measured FSR values (i.e., interquartile range) was inversely correlated with the average duration between biopsies. Aside from that, the variation in reported FSR values could not be explained by differences in the experimental design and analytical methods, and none of the most commonly used approaches stood out as clearly superior in terms of consistency of results and/or within-study variability. We conclude that the variability in reported values is in part due to 1) differences in experimental design (e.g., choice of precursor pool) and 2) considerable within-subject variability. The summary of the results from our analysis can be used as guidelines for “normal” average basal FSR values at rest in healthy adults.

Publisher

American Physiological Society

Subject

Physiology (medical),Physiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3