Methodological comparison of active- and passive-driven oscillations in blood pressure; implications for the assessment of cerebral pressure-flow relationships

Abstract

We examined the between-day reproducibility of active (squat-stand maneuvers)- and passive [oscillatory lower-body negative pressure (OLBNP) maneuvers]-driven oscillations in blood pressure. These relationships were examined in both younger ( n = 10; 25 ± 3 yr) and older ( n = 9; 66 ± 4 yr) adults. Each testing protocol incorporated rest (5 min), followed by driven maneuvers at 0.05 (5 min) and 0.10 (5 min) Hz to increase blood-pressure variability and improve assessment of the pressure-flow dynamics using linear transfer function analysis. Beat-to-beat blood pressure, middle cerebral artery velocity, and end-tidal partial pressure of CO2 were monitored. The pressure-flow relationship was quantified in the very low (0.02-0.07 Hz) and low (0.07–0.20 Hz) frequencies (LF; spontaneous data) and at 0.05 and 0.10 Hz (driven maneuvers point estimates). Although there were no between-age differences, very few spontaneous and OLBNP transfer function metrics met the criteria for acceptable reproducibility, as reflected in a between-day, within-subject coefficient of variation (CoV) of <20%. Combined CoV data consist of LF coherence (15.1 ± 12.2%), LF gain (15.1 ± 12.2%), and LF normalized gain (18.5 ± 10.9%); OLBNP data consist of 0.05 (12.1 ± 15.%) and 0.10 (4.7 ± 7.8%) Hz coherence. In contrast, the squat-stand maneuvers revealed that all metrics (coherence: 0.6 ± 0.5 and 0.3 ± 0.5%; gain: 17.4 ± 12.3 and 12.7 ± 11.0%; normalized gain: 16.7 ± 10.9 and 15.7 ± 11.0%; and phase: 11.6 ± 10.2 and 17.3 ± 10.8%) at 0.05 and 0.10 Hz, respectively, were considered biologically acceptable for reproducibility. These findings have important implications for the reliable assessment and interpretation of cerebral pressure-flow dynamics in humans.