Individualizing the aorto-radial pressure transfer function: feasibility of a model-based approach

Author:

Segers P.1,Carlier S.2,Pasquet A.2,Rabben S. I.3,Hellevik L. R.3,Remme E.3,De Backer T.4,De Sutter J.4,Thomas J. D.2,Verdonck P.1

Affiliation:

1. Hydraulics Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Technology, University of Gent, 9000 Gent, Belgium;

2. The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195;

3. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; and

4. Cardiology Department, University Hospital, University of Gent, Belgium

Abstract

We fitted a three-segment transmission line model for the radial-carotid/aorta pressure transfer function (TFF) in 31 controls and 30 patients with coronary artery disease using noninvasively measured (tonometry) radial and carotid artery pressures (Pcar). Except for the distal reflection coefficient (0.85 ± 0.21 in patients vs. 0.71 ± 0.25 in controls; P < 0.05), model parameters were not different between patients or controls. Parameters were not related to blood pressure, age, or heart rate. We further assessed a point-to-point averaged TFF (TFFavg) as well as upper (TFFmax) and lower (TFFmin) enveloping TFF. Pulse pressure (PP) and augmentation index (AIx) were derived on original and reconstructed Pcar (Pcar,r). TFFavg yielded closest morphological agreement between Pcar and Pcar,r (root mean square = 4.3 ± 2.3 mmHg), and TTFavg best predicted PP (41.5 ± 11.8 vs. 41.1 ± 10.0 mmHg measured) and AIx (−0.02 ± 0.19 vs. 0.01 ± 0.19). PP and AIx, calculated from Pcar or Pcar,r, were higher in patients than in controls, irrespectively of the TFF used. We conclude that 1) averaged TFF yield significant discrepancies between reconstructed and measured pressure waveforms and subsequent derived AIx; and 2) different TFFs seem to preserve the information in the pressure wave that discriminates between controls and patients.

Publisher

American Physiological Society

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Physiology

Cited by 77 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3