Antibiotics versus cardiovascular support in a canine model of human septic shock

Author:

Natanson C.1,Danner R. L.1,Reilly J. M.1,Doerfler M. L.1,Hoffman W. D.1,Akin G. L.1,Hosseini J. M.1,Banks S. M.1,Elin R. J.1,MacVittie T. J.1,et al.1

Affiliation:

1. Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health,Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

Abstract

This study compares the efficacy of antibiotics (cefoxitin and gentamicin), cardiovascular support (fluids and dopamine titrated by intravascular monitoring to hemodynamic end points), and a combination of these two therapies in dogs with septic shock induced by an intraperitoneal clot containing Escherichia coli. Survival rates were 0, 13, 13, and 43% in groups receiving no therapy (controls), antibiotics alone, cardiovascular support alone, or combined therapy (P less than 0.01), respectively. The improved survival observed in the group receiving combined therapy considerably exceeded that in the groups receiving either therapy alone (i.e., a synergistic increase P less than 0.05). Compared with antibiotics alone, cardiovascular support alone prolonged survival time (P less than 0.006). All groups developed similar and significant (P less than 0.01) increases in endotoxin levels; however, in the combined therapy group, nonsurvivors (compared with survivors) had higher levels of endotoxemia (P less than 0.05). Although survivors and nonsurvivors in the combined therapy group required similar (P = 0.10) quantities of fluid therapy, nonsurvivors gained more weight (P less than 0.05), suggesting abnormal vascular permeability with extravascular retention of fluids in the nonsurvivors. This study demonstrates that antibiotics alone and cardiovascular support alone are relatively ineffective in the treatment of septic shock. When combined, however, these two therapies provide moderately successful treatment for this highly lethal disorder.

Publisher

American Physiological Society

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Physiology

Cited by 75 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3