Author:
Jakobs Lasse,Mehren Rainer,Fögele Janis,Liefner Ingo,Losacker Sebastian
Abstract
Abstract
The transfer of research findings into teaching practice is often defined as a mutual exchange process between research and teaching practice. In the exchange and handling of new findings, the implicitaction-guiding orientations of teachers in particular are highly important. The present study is dedicated to reconstructing these orientations of teacher trainers of geography, who, as educators of trainee teachers in the second practical phase of the German teacher training system, occupy a unique position between research and teaching practice. Using the documentary method, different orientations of the teacher trainers were reconstructed through multiple group discussions. These were conducted in the context of a one-year training series on new insights into China’s innovation-based economic development. These orientations move along a continuum between instruction and co-construction. From these findings, important insights for future transfer research and practice can be derived.
Reference45 articles.
1. Applis, S., Hofmann, R., & Höhnle, S. (2015). Zur dokumentarischen Methode in der geographie- didaktischen Forschung. In A. Budke & M. Kuckuck (Eds.), Geographiedidaktische Forschungsmethoden (pp. 243–268). Lit Verlag.
2. Asbrand, B., & Martens, M. (2018). Dokumentarische Unterrichtsforschung. Springer VS.
3. Association of Teacher Educators (n.d.). Standards for Teacher Educators. https://ate1.org/standards-for-teacher-educators.
4. Baumert, J., Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV Model of Teachers’ Professional Competence. In Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M. (eds.) Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education (vol. 8). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_2
5. Bohnsack, R. (2010a). Gruppendiskussionsverfahren und dokumentarische Methode. In B. Friebertshäuser, A. Langer & A. Prengel (Hrsg.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft (pp. 205-218). Juventa.