Affiliation:
1. Department of Radiation Oncology , Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences , Lucknow India -226010
Abstract
Abstract
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is being practiced for the last several years with a special approach for radiation therapy in post-mastectomy breast cancer patients. Meeting the cardiac dose constraints has always been a challenge during radiotherapy planning by both IMRT and VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy) of post-mastectomy left breast patients. With the advancement in IMRT planning techniques, it has been modified to VMAT with more degrees of freedom for modulation and is being utilised more frequently. This helps in obtaining a suitable plan for achieving both the dose homogeneity in target volume and dose constraints to Organ at Risk (OAR). 10 Patients with carcinoma of the left breast (post-mastectomy) were selected for this study. VMAT treatment plans for these patients were generated for 6 MV photons on the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS) using two types of optimization modes i.e. Pareto and Constrained mode available in Monaco TPS. For comparative dosimetric evaluation of the efficacy of these two types of optimization modes similar calculation algorithms, calculation grids, arcs, and beam sequencing parameters were used for generating treatment plans. The dosimetric quantities such as volume receiving more than 95% of the prescribed dose (V95), volume receiving more than 107% of the prescribed dose (V107) and Maximum dose (Dmax) for target volume, mean dose (Dmean) for heart, volume receiving more than 30 Gy (V30) volume receiving more than 20 Gy (V20) volume receiving more than 5 Gy (V5) for ipsilateral lung and total monitor units delivered were analysed for both optimization modes. A judicious mix of multiple planning parameters and variables using these two modes of optimization was applied and recorded. Both optimization modes yielded similar outcomes. However, Pareto mode has shown better coverage for planning target volume (PTV) with comparable doses to OARs.
Reference14 articles.
1. 1. Bogue J, Wan J, Lavey RS, Parsai EI. Dosimetric comparison of VMAT with integrated skin flash to 3D field-in-field tangents for left breast irradiation. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(2):24-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12527
2. 2. Dumane VA, Lo YC, Green S. Combination of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and partially wide tangents (PWT) for improved organ sparing in a left-sided and right-sided breast cancer case receiving regional nodal irradiation (RNI): A technical note. Appl Rad Oncol. 2018;7(2):31-38.
3. 3. Byrne M, Archibald-Heeren B, Hu Y, et al. Comparison of semi-automated tangential VMAT with 3DCRT for breast or chest wall and regional nodes. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018;19(5):684-693. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12442
4. 4. Sudha SP, Seenisamy R, Bharadhwaj K. Comparison of dosimetric parameters of volumetric modulated arc therapy and three dimensional conformal radiotherapy in post mastectomy patients with carcinoma breast. J Can Res Ther. 2018;14(5):1005-1009. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.189400
5. 5. Fogliata A, Seppäla J, Reggiori G, et al. Dosimetric trade-offs in breast treatment with VMAT technique. Br J Radiol. 2016;90:1070. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160701