Affiliation:
1. Hiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center , Japan
2. Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center , Japan
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: This study was conducted to demonstrate the feasibility of X-ray output constancy quality assurance (QA) of a linear accelerator for various gantry angles using the Stealth Chamber.
Methods: The X-ray output constancy of a Varian TrueBeam STx was evaluated under various gantry angles and a 10 × 10 cm2 field size using a Stealth Chamber. Specifically, 10X and 10X-flattening-filter-free beams with dose rates of 600 and 2400 monitor units (MU)/min, respectively, were used. The Stealth Chamber was attached to the gantry head, and irradiation was performed every 45° for gantry angles of 0-315°. To evaluate the variations in the output constancy with respect to the gantry angle, the acquired values were normalized to the value corresponding to a 0° gantry angle. The obtained results were utilized to determine the correction factors for all gantry angles. To verify the correction factors, additional measurements were performed for five days.
Results: The maximum variation in the output constancy measurement relative to the output constancy at a 0° gantry angle was found to be approximately 4.0% for both energy beams at a gantry angle of 180°. Furthermore, the measured values were dependent on the gantry angle. Upon applying the correction factor, the variation in the output constancy with respect to the gantry angle was less than 0.5%.
Conclusions: Output constancy QA using the Stealth Chamber for various gantry angles was found to be feasible with the application of a correction factor.
Reference8 articles.
1. 1. ICRU Report 24. Determination of absorbed dose in a patient irradiated by beams of x- or gamma-rays in radiotherapy procedures. J ICRU. 1976;os13(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru/os13.1.Report2410.1093/jicru/os13.1.Report24
2. 2. Kutcher GJ, Coia L, Gillin M, et al. Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40. Med Phys. 1994;21(4):581–618. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.59731610.1118/1.597316
3. 3. Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, et al. Task Group 142 Report: Quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys. 2009;36(9):4197-242. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.319039210.1118/1.3190392
4. 4. Loyd MD, Lane RG, Laxton J, et al. Long term variation in beam symmetry as a function of gantry angle for a computer-controlled linear accelerator. Med Phys. 1989;16(4):614-617. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.59636310.1118/1.596363
5. 5. Blad B, Jacobsson L, Wendel P. The influence of the magnetron frequency, the servo settings and the gantry angle on the flatness and the dose calibration of a linear accelerator. J Med Eng Technol. 1998;22(4):185-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/0309190980903253910.3109/03091909809032539
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献