Affiliation:
1. Keller - Middle East and Africa, PO Box 111323 , Dubai , UAE
Abstract
Abstract
The stone column is a cost-effective, sustainable, and technically sound ground improvement solution for enhancing bearing capacity, minimizing settlement, and mitigating the liquefaction potential of a wide range of soils. In this study, the main methods of stone column execution are briefly explained, design approaches are discussed, and testing procedures are elaborated on in more detail. The results of plate load tests (PLT) are numerically simulated to back-calculate stone column properties. In this research, the Hardening Soil model (HS) is selected to simulate stone columns and soil profiles. The outcomes of this modelling and the adopted calculation approach are verified by three-zone load tests (ZLT) performed on grounds reinforced by stone columns in various projects. Reasonably good matches are observed between experimental and numerical results, approving parameters back-analyzed from PLTs and the employed calculation methodology. Finally, a widely used analytical approach of the calculation of stone columns (Priebe method) is compared with the numerical and experimental results of the studied ZLTs. The comparison confirmed that the Priebe method could practically calculate the settlement of grounds treated by stone columns although settlements were slightly higher than experimentally observed values. In the end, the advantages and limitations of each method are discussed.
Reference30 articles.
1. [1] Ambily, A.P. & Gandhi, S.R. (2007) Behavior of stone columns based on experimental and FEM analysis. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (4), 405-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:4(405)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:4(405)
2. [2] ASTM D 1195. Standard Test Method for Repetitive Static Plate Load Tests of Soils and Flexible Pavement Components, for Use in Evaluation and Design of Airport and Highway Pavements.
3. [3] ASTM C 131. Standard Test Method for Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine.
4. [4] Babu, M.D., Nayak, S. & Shivashankar, R. (2013) A critical review of construction, analysis and behavior of stone columns. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 31 (1), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9555-910.1007/s10706-012-9555-9
5. [5] Benmebarek, S., Remadna, A. & Benmebarek, N. (2018) Numerical Modelling of Stone Column Installation Effects on Performance of Circular Footing. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 4, 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40891-018-0140-z10.1007/s40891-018-0140-z