Affiliation:
1. Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge , RUHS College of Dental Sciences , Jaipur , India
Abstract
Abstract
Patients with minor defects of the alveolar ridge and hard palate can easily be treated by surgical closure, while patients with larger defects are more amenable to prosthetic restoration. The case report describes the rehabilitation of a dentate maxillectomy patient with a definitive closed hollow bulb cast partial obturator. A tripod retainer design was chosen for direct retention in the case. The tripod design consisted of a T-bar clasp placed on the left first central incisor and two embrasure clasps with buccal retention and palatal bracing components between the right first & second premolar and right first & second molar. A complete palate major connector was designed to ensure uniform distribution of functional load across tissues. The remaining teeth, the palate, and the rest provided support for the prosthesis. Prosthetic rehabilitation of the defect with a definitive obturator thus seals tissue openings in the palate, improves deglutition, speech, mastication, aesthetics, and significantly improves quality of life.
Subject
General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Dentistry
Reference18 articles.
1. Kumar P, Jain V, Thakar A. Speech rehabilitation of maxillectomy patients with hollow bulb obturator. Indian J Palliat Care 2012;18:207-12.10.4103/0973-1075.105692
2. Sharma AB, Beumer J 3rd. Reconstruction of maxillary defects: the case for prosthetic rehabilitation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:1770-3.10.1016/j.joms.2005.08.013
3. Hertrampf K, Wenz HJ, Lehmann KM, Lorenz W, Koller M. Quality of life of patients with maxillofacial defects after treatment for malignancy. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:657-65.
4. Chigurupati R, Aloor N, Salas R, Schmidt BL. Quality of life after maxillectomy and prosthetic obturator rehabilitation. J Oral Maxil Surg 2013;71:1471–8.10.1016/j.joms.2013.02.002
5. Lethaus B, Lie N, De Beer F, Kessler P, De Baat C, Verdonck HW. Surgical and prosthetic reconsiderations in patients with maxillectomy. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:138–42.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02031.x