Machine Learning and Traditional Econometric Models: A Systematic Mapping Study

Author:

Pérez-Pons María E.1,Parra-Dominguez Javier12,Omatu Sigeru3,Herrera-Viedma Enrique4,Corchado Juan Manuel1256

Affiliation:

1. University of Salamanca , BISITE Research Group Edificio I+D+i , Calle Espejo 2 , , Salamanca , Spain

2. Air Institute, IoT Digital Innovation Hub , Salamanca , Spain

3. Hiroshima University , Digital Manufacturing Education and Research Center Division of Data Driven Smart System 3-10-31 Kagamiyama East-Hiroshima , , Japan

4. University of Granada Colegio Máximo de Cartuja , Campus Universitario de Cartuja C.P. Granada , Spain

5. Department of Electronics, Information and Communication, Faculty of Engineering , Osaka Institute of Technology , Osaka , Japan

6. Pusat Komputeran dan Informatik , Universiti Malaysia Kelantan , Karung Berkunci 36, Pengkaan Chepa, 16100 Kota Bharu, Kelantan , Malaysia .

Abstract

Abstract Context: Machine Learning (ML) is a disruptive concept that has given rise to and generated interest in different applications in many fields of study. The purpose of Machine Learning is to solve real-life problems by automatically learning and improving from experience without being explicitly programmed for a specific problem, but for a generic type of problem. This article approaches the different applications of ML in a series of econometric methods. Objective: The objective of this research is to identify the latest applications and do a comparative study of the performance of econometric and ML models. The study aimed to find empirical evidence for the performance of ML algorithms being superior to traditional econometric models. The Methodology of systematic mapping of literature has been followed to carry out this research, according to the guidelines established by [39], and [58] that facilitate the identification of studies published about this subject. Results: The results show, that in most cases ML outperforms econometric models, while in other cases the best performance has been achieved by combining traditional methods and ML applications. Conclusion: inclusion and exclusions criteria have been applied and 52 articles closely related articles have been reviewed. The conclusion drawn from this research is that it is a field that is growing, which is something that is well known nowadays and that there is no certainty as to the performance of ML being always superior to that of econometric models.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Hardware and Architecture,Modeling and Simulation,Information Systems

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3