Sacrificial citizens? Activation and retrenchment in Ireland’s political economy

Author:

Dukelow Fiona1

Affiliation:

1. School of Applied Social Studies , University College Cork , Ireland

Abstract

Abstract This article provides a critical commentary on Irish activation policy. It is framed with reference to the point made in Pathways to Work 2016–2020 that a key purpose of activation is ‘to help ensure a supply of labour at competitive rates’. It looks at how a tougher work-first activation regime can be situated within the wider landscape of reform and retrenchment in the social protection system following the 2008 financial crisis. Broadly utilising Pierson’s concepts of programmatic and systemic retrenchment, it situates the roll-out of activation within shifts toward greater reliance on means-tested benefits for the unemployed, and toward work first, with varying degrees of compulsion, for other working-age adults in the social protection system. Suggesting that this results in a hierarchy of ‘welfare sacrifice’ for the sake of the competitiveness of the Irish economy, it also looks briefly at how some of these ‘sacrifices’ are experienced by different groups both in and out of the labour market. The article concludes by noting that the Covid-19 pandemic has temporarily transformed state–market relations such as these; however, whether this offers the opportunity to forge a more supportive turn in activation policy post-pandemic remains an open question.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference46 articles.

1. Barbier, J.-C. (2004). Systems of social protection in Europe: Two contrasted paths to activation, and maybe a third. In J. Lind, H. Knudsen & H. Jørgensen (Eds), Labour and employment regulations in Europe (pp. 233–54). London: Peter Lang.

2. Bonoli, G. (2011). Active labour market policy in a changing economic context. In J. Clasen & D. Clegg (Eds), Regulating the risk of unemployment (pp. 318–32). Oxford: Oxford UP.

3. Borosch, N., Kuhlmann, J., & Blum, S. (2016). Opening up opportunities and risks? Retrenchment, activation and targeting as main trends of recent welfare state reform across Europe. In K. Schubert, P. de Villota, & J. Kuhlmann (Eds), Challenges to European welfare systems (pp. 769–91). Heidelberg: Springer.

4. Boyle, C. (2019). Review of carer’s supports. Retrieved from https://igees.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Review-of-Carers-Supports.pdf [14 August 2020].

5. Brown, W. (2016). Sacrificial citizenship: Neoliberalism, human capital and austerity politics. Constellations, 23 (1), 3–14.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3