Affiliation:
1. School of Applied Social Studies , University College Cork , Ireland
Abstract
Abstract
This article provides a critical commentary on Irish activation policy. It is framed with reference to the point made in Pathways to Work 2016–2020 that a key purpose of activation is ‘to help ensure a supply of labour at competitive rates’. It looks at how a tougher work-first activation regime can be situated within the wider landscape of reform and retrenchment in the social protection system following the 2008 financial crisis. Broadly utilising Pierson’s concepts of programmatic and systemic retrenchment, it situates the roll-out of activation within shifts toward greater reliance on means-tested benefits for the unemployed, and toward work first, with varying degrees of compulsion, for other working-age adults in the social protection system. Suggesting that this results in a hierarchy of ‘welfare sacrifice’ for the sake of the competitiveness of the Irish economy, it also looks briefly at how some of these ‘sacrifices’ are experienced by different groups both in and out of the labour market. The article concludes by noting that the Covid-19 pandemic has temporarily transformed state–market relations such as these; however, whether this offers the opportunity to forge a more supportive turn in activation policy post-pandemic remains an open question.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference46 articles.
1. Barbier, J.-C. (2004). Systems of social protection in Europe: Two contrasted paths to activation, and maybe a third. In J. Lind, H. Knudsen & H. Jørgensen (Eds), Labour and employment regulations in Europe (pp. 233–54). London: Peter Lang.
2. Bonoli, G. (2011). Active labour market policy in a changing economic context. In J. Clasen & D. Clegg (Eds), Regulating the risk of unemployment (pp. 318–32). Oxford: Oxford UP.
3. Borosch, N., Kuhlmann, J., & Blum, S. (2016). Opening up opportunities and risks? Retrenchment, activation and targeting as main trends of recent welfare state reform across Europe. In K. Schubert, P. de Villota, & J. Kuhlmann (Eds), Challenges to European welfare systems (pp. 769–91). Heidelberg: Springer.
4. Boyle, C. (2019). Review of carer’s supports. Retrieved from https://igees.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Review-of-Carers-Supports.pdf [14 August 2020].
5. Brown, W. (2016). Sacrificial citizenship: Neoliberalism, human capital and austerity politics. Constellations, 23 (1), 3–14.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献