Affiliation:
1. School of Law and Government , Dublin City University , Ireland
Abstract
Abstract
JobBridge, the Irish National Internship Scheme, was a labour activation measure launched in July 2011, during a period of extreme economic crisis, and was marketed as a chance for young people to gain career experience in quality work placements. Over 60 per cent of participants found employment after leaving the scheme but it suffered from high deadweight losses and was widely criticised as exploitative during its existence. This was quite predictable, which leaves the puzzle as to why JobBridge was designed without more regulations to protect the entry-level jobs market and the interests of the unemployed? This paper will trace the processes behind this suboptimal decision-making. First, it will show the institutional factors influencing poor policy decisions on labour activation. Then it will explain the main incentives behind an under-regulated programme, which were the need to develop a workable scheme as quickly as possible and to do this without significant funding. Finally, it will show how the decision-making process prioritised the interests of the Labour Party, government, business and the concerned parents of unemployed youth over the interests of the unemployed.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference54 articles.
1. Arlow, J. (2016). Evaluating the JobBridge scheme. Retrieved from https://politicalreform.ie/2016/06/07/evaluating-the-jobbridgescheme/comment-page-1/ [12 December 2018].
2. Baker, D., Glyn, A., Howell, D. R., & Schmitt, J. (2005). Labor market institutions and unemployment: A critical assessment of the cross-country evidence. In D. R. Howell (Ed.), Fighting unemployment: The limits of free market orthodoxy (pp. 511–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Barry, A. (2013). JobBridge: 3 out of 5 interns secure employment. Retrieved from https://www.thejournal.ie/jobridge-paid-employment-891867-May2013/ [9 December 2018].
4. Baturo, A., & Arlow, J. (2018). Is there a ‘revolving door’ to the private sector in Irish politics? Irish Political Studies, 33 (3), 381–406.10.1080/07907184.2017.1365709
5. Baumgartner, F., Jones, B. D., & Mortensen, P. B. (2014). Punctuated equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in public policymaking. In P. A. Sabatier & C. M. Weible (Eds), Theories of the policy process (pp. 59–105). Colorado: Westview Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献