Parliamentary oversight: Oireachtas committees and the Dáil Committee on Public Accounts in the twenty-first century

Author:

Lynch Catherine1

Affiliation:

1. 1 Houses of the Oireachtas Service , Ireland

Abstract

Abstract Strong parliaments hold the government, its departments and the wider public administration to account. Such parliaments are built on strong and active committee systems. For a long time, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) was the only oversight committee consistently in place in the Houses of the Oireachtas. This article explains how the committee system has been gradually expanded and strengthened, and how its remit to oversee the actions of the government is wide. It explains the institutional factors that lead to the continued prominence of the PAC, including how it draws on the expert, independent reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General to conduct its oversight work, while noting that the PAC still faces the same challenges as other committees concerning a wide remit, finite resources and the multiple motivations of its membership. The work of the PAC is described and placed in the context of the financial scrutiny cycle which is being developed in the Houses of the Oireachtas. This is followed by a discussion of how the PAC manages its potentially wide remit to conduct ex post financial scrutiny of public expenditure, and the balance between what is referred to as ‘police-patrol’, rather than ‘fire-alarm’, scrutiny and the procedural changes which are designed to ensure that the PAC (with the authority of the Dáil) can examine and hold actors to account for the expenditure of any public money.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference31 articles.

1. Benton, M., & Russell, M. (2013). Assessing the impact of parliamentary oversight committees. Parliamentary Affairs, 66(4), 772–97.

2. Canadian Council of Public Accounts Committees. (2008). Parliamentary oversight: committees and relationships. Canadian Council of Public Accounts Committees.

3. Dáil Committee on Procedure and Seanad Committee on Procedure and Privilege. (2020, December). Report on the response of the Houses of the Oireachtas to the judgements of the Supreme Court in the Kerins case. Houses of the Oireachtas.

4. Dineen, S. (2012). John McGuinness on the Public Accounts Committee. https://www.eolasmagazine.ie/john-mcguinness-on-the-public-accounts-committee/

5. Donson, F., & O’Donovan, D. (2015). Law and administration in Ireland. Clarus Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3