Affiliation:
1. National Economic and Social Council , Dublin , Ireland
2. School of Law and Government , Dublin City University , Ireland
3. NorDubCo , Dublin City University , Ireland
Abstract
Abstract
Some policies fail to achieve their goals and some succeed. More often than not, it is unclear whether a policy has been a success or a failure, sometimes because the goal was not clear, or because there were a multitude of goals. In this introduction to this special issue we discuss what we mean by policy success and failure, and assume that policy success or failure is ultimately the result of the decision-making process: policy success results from good policies, which tend to come from good decisions, which are in turn the result of a good decision-making process. We then set out a framework for understanding the conditions under which good and bad decisions are made. Built upon factors highlighted in a broad literature, we argue that a potential interaction of institutions, interests and ideology creates incentives for certain outcomes, and leads to certain information being gathered or prioritised when it is being processed. This can bias decision-makers to choose a certain course of action that may be suboptimal, or in other cases there is an absence of bias, creating the possibility for making successful policy choices.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference47 articles.
1. Andrews, M. (2018). Public policy failure: ‘How often?’ and ‘What is failure, anyway?’ A study of World Bank project performance [CID faculty working paper no. 344]. Massachusetts: Centre for International Development at Harvard University.
2. Argote L., Devadas, R., & Melone, N. (1991). The base-rate fallacy: Contrasting processes and outcomes of group and individual judgments. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Process, 46, 296–310.
3. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. A. (2009). Judgement in managerial decision making (7th edn). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Birkland, T. A. (2007). Lessons of disaster: Policy change after catastrophic events. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献