Policy success/policy failure: A framework for understanding policy choices

Author:

FitzGerald Cathal1,O’Malley Eoin2,Broin Deiric Ó3

Affiliation:

1. National Economic and Social Council , Dublin , Ireland

2. School of Law and Government , Dublin City University , Ireland

3. NorDubCo , Dublin City University , Ireland

Abstract

Abstract Some policies fail to achieve their goals and some succeed. More often than not, it is unclear whether a policy has been a success or a failure, sometimes because the goal was not clear, or because there were a multitude of goals. In this introduction to this special issue we discuss what we mean by policy success and failure, and assume that policy success or failure is ultimately the result of the decision-making process: policy success results from good policies, which tend to come from good decisions, which are in turn the result of a good decision-making process. We then set out a framework for understanding the conditions under which good and bad decisions are made. Built upon factors highlighted in a broad literature, we argue that a potential interaction of institutions, interests and ideology creates incentives for certain outcomes, and leads to certain information being gathered or prioritised when it is being processed. This can bias decision-makers to choose a certain course of action that may be suboptimal, or in other cases there is an absence of bias, creating the possibility for making successful policy choices.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference47 articles.

1. Andrews, M. (2018). Public policy failure: ‘How often?’ and ‘What is failure, anyway?’ A study of World Bank project performance [CID faculty working paper no. 344]. Massachusetts: Centre for International Development at Harvard University.

2. Argote L., Devadas, R., & Melone, N. (1991). The base-rate fallacy: Contrasting processes and outcomes of group and individual judgments. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Process, 46, 296–310.

3. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

4. Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. A. (2009). Judgement in managerial decision making (7th edn). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

5. Birkland, T. A. (2007). Lessons of disaster: Policy change after catastrophic events. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3