Affiliation:
1. Center for Conflict Studies , Philipps University Marburg , Ketzerbach 11, 35032 Marburg , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Roma-related development and policy discourse often represents the Roma development ‘subjects’ as disempowered victims. Against the pervasiveness of such narratives, a close look at the local level conflicts arising during the implementation of a World Bank development project in destitute Roma communities from Romania lays bare the strategies of unassisted social mobility in which a group of Roma engage. Not large or well-defined enough to be constituted into a real ‘class’ in sociological terms, this strategic group is made up of Roma civil servants (mediators, local experts, Romani language teachers) who negotiate their engagement in development projects on their own terms and use the material and immaterial resources that projects offer to enact their own upward social mobility. Often, though, this comes at the cost of a growing socio-economic gap between themselves and the most destitute parts of Roma communities, which complicates their involvement in development projects. The article underlines the necessity of taking into account both the strategies of unassisted social mobility of Roma development brokers, and the internal power imbalances that the development apparatus inevitably ends up producing in Roma communities.
Reference47 articles.
1. Acton, T., Rostas, I., Ryder, A. (2014). The Roma in Europe: The Debate over the Possibilities for Empowerment to Seek Social Justice. In: A. Ryder, S. Cemlyn, T. Acton (Eds.), Hearing the Voice of Gypsies, Roma and Travellers: Inclusive Community Development. Bristol: Policy Press (pp. 177–196).
2. Berner, E. (2010). Participation between Tyranny and Emancipation. In: G. M. Gómez, A. A. Corradi, P. Goulart, R. Namara (Eds.), Participation for What: Social Change or Social Control? e Hague: ISS and Hivos (pp. 1–7).
3. Berner, E., Phillips, B (2005). Left to Their Own Devices: Community Self-help between Alternative Development and Neoliberalism. Community Development Journal, 40(1), 17–29.
4. Bierschenk, T. (1988). Development Projects as Arenas of Negotiation for Strategic Groups: A case study from Benin. Sociologia Ruralis, 28(2/3), 145–160.
5. Clark, C. (2017). ‘Romani Activism and Community Development: Are Mediators the Way Forward?’ In: G. Craig (Ed.), Community Organising Against Racism: Race, Ethnicity and Community Development. Bristol: Policy Press (pp. 185–198).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献