The Covid-19 pandemic: collective action and European public policy under stress

Author:

Kovac Mitja1,Elkanawati Amira1,Gjikolli Vita1,Vandenberghe Ann-Sophie2

Affiliation:

1. University of Ljubljana School of Economics and Business

2. Erasmus University Rotterdam Erasmus School of Law

Abstract

Abstract The European continent faces an apocalyptic pandemic that poses mortal danger to millions of citizens. This paper seeks to address the role played by European public policy in addressing the Covid-19 pandemic. Currently, each Member State across Europe is applying its own measures to deal with the coronavirus; namely, decentralised decision-making that could trigger political tensions among the states. The paper argues that European public policy must change rapidly and fundamentally if these tensions are to be successfully managed; otherwise, such policy might simply cease to exist. Moreover, the known and notorious problem of collective action, information asymmetries, irrationality, negative externalities and the related free-riding phenomenon persistently are distorting the Member States’ combined efforts, resulting in deficient attempts to contain the spread of Covid-19. The paper also argues that the current unprecedented outbreak of this superspreading virus calls for a bigger EU-wide coordinated response. We argue that the Covid-19 pandemic is a good example of an area in which the central EU level holds a comparative advantage over lower levels of government. In addition, the paper offers several substantive insights into ways to improve the public policy response in the ‘war’ against Covid-19.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference94 articles.

1. Adler, R. S., and Pittle, R. D. 1984. “Cajolery or command: are education campaigns an adequate substitute for regulation?” Yale Journal on Regulation, 1(2), 4.

2. Akerloff A. G. 1970. “The Market for Lemons: Quality, Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,” 84 Quarterly Journal of Economics 488.

3. Alchian, A. A., and Demsetz, H. 1972. “Production, information costs, and economic organization,” 62 American Economic Review, pp. 777–795.

4. Allais, M. 1953. “Fondements d’une Theorie Positive des Choix Comportant un Risque et Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de L’Ecole Americaine,” 21 Econometrica 4, pp. 503–546.

5. Becker, G. S., Grossman, M., and Murphy, K. M. 1990. “An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction” (No. w3322). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3