Affiliation:
1. University of Ljubljana School of Economics and Business
2. Erasmus University Rotterdam Erasmus School of Law
Abstract
Abstract
The European continent faces an apocalyptic pandemic that poses mortal danger to millions of citizens. This paper seeks to address the role played by European public policy in addressing the Covid-19 pandemic. Currently, each Member State across Europe is applying its own measures to deal with the coronavirus; namely, decentralised decision-making that could trigger political tensions among the states. The paper argues that European public policy must change rapidly and fundamentally if these tensions are to be successfully managed; otherwise, such policy might simply cease to exist. Moreover, the known and notorious problem of collective action, information asymmetries, irrationality, negative externalities and the related free-riding phenomenon persistently are distorting the Member States’ combined efforts, resulting in deficient attempts to contain the spread of Covid-19. The paper also argues that the current unprecedented outbreak of this superspreading virus calls for a bigger EU-wide coordinated response. We argue that the Covid-19 pandemic is a good example of an area in which the central EU level holds a comparative advantage over lower levels of government. In addition, the paper offers several substantive insights into ways to improve the public policy response in the ‘war’ against Covid-19.
Subject
Law,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference94 articles.
1. Adler, R. S., and Pittle, R. D. 1984. “Cajolery or command: are education campaigns an adequate substitute for regulation?” Yale Journal on Regulation, 1(2), 4.
2. Akerloff A. G. 1970. “The Market for Lemons: Quality, Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,” 84 Quarterly Journal of Economics 488.
3. Alchian, A. A., and Demsetz, H. 1972. “Production, information costs, and economic organization,” 62 American Economic Review, pp. 777–795.
4. Allais, M. 1953. “Fondements d’une Theorie Positive des Choix Comportant un Risque et Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de L’Ecole Americaine,” 21 Econometrica 4, pp. 503–546.
5. Becker, G. S., Grossman, M., and Murphy, K. M. 1990. “An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction” (No. w3322). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献