Realising South Africa's National Development Plan goals: The need for change to a collaborative democracy to facilitate community participation

Author:

Auriacombe Christelle1,Meyer Natanya2

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Management, Governance and Public Policy , University of Johannesburg .

2. DHET-NRF South Sarchi in Entrepreneurship Education, College of Business and Economics , University of Johannesburg .

Abstract

Abstract A democratic government should adhere to firm public administration principles, legal instruments, structures and mechanisms. However, providing these elements is insufficient to guarantee integrated participative service delivery. This article aims to unravel the most important elements required to create a participative governance model that fuses horizontal intra-relationships between public officials and departments and vertical interactions between public and private networks. The research methodology entailed a critical desktop document analysis of books, articles, regulatory policy and strategy documents. Network governance was conceptually and contextually analysed through unobtrusive research methods. It served as a possible analytical model for democratic governance, where citizens take centre stage in participative decision-making. The findings provide both a description and a contextualisation of the themes that emerged from the research. The article highlights that the network governance model could help South Africa move forward from a dated, elitist democracy based on a dependency model, to a participative democracy model, where communities and government work together. The article concludes that South Africa can only realise the National Development Plans (NDPs) 2030 goals (to maximise people's development, strengthen governance networks and enhance state's capacity to provide adequate public services) by drawing on partnerships within a network governance framework.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference89 articles.

1. Ahmad, I., Oláh, J., Popp, J., & Máté, D. (2018). Does Business Group Affiliation Matter for Superior Performance? Evidence from Pakistan. Sustainability, 10(9), 3060.

2. Albareda, L. & Waddock, S. (2018). Networked CSR governance: A whole network approach to meta-governance. Business & Society, 57(4), 636–675.

3. Alexander, G. & Kane-Berman J. (2014). The 80/20 Report: Local government in 80 indicators over 20 years. Report for the SA Institute of Race Relations. Retrieved 9 April, 2019, from https://irr.org.za/reports/occasional-reports/files/the-80-20-report-on-local-government-26-may-2014-1.pdf.

4. Ascher, W., Brewer, G.D., Cheema, G.S. & Heffron, J.M. (2016). Evolution of Governance and Development Administration Theory. In The Evolution of Development Thinking (pp. 67–83). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

5. Auriacombe, C.J. (2014). Democratising Service Delivery. UJ Internal Handbook for PMG2A11. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3