Affiliation:
1. The University of Latvia , Riga , Latvia Rezekne Academy of Technologies , Rēzekne, Latvia
Abstract
Abstract
The article addresses and provides an introduction to pedagogy in its capacity of science and a university discipline in the field of education sciences. Nowadays not only teacher education programmes are embedded in theories and follow transitions of pedagogy. These have become even more complex, therefore, challenge new discussions in the evolving importance of human relations and transition towards learning-centred science of pedagogy to underpin practice of competence-oriented education.
Based on the main historical processes in Latvia and along with informative insight into the practices of European universities and research, the article traces the traditional background of pedagogy, the challenging role of philosophy to foster understanding of pedagogy as a unique, well-structured science with its object of investigation, which is not being explored by any other science. Alongside the discrete field of education and constantly evolving research, pedagogy develops its theories, all-level practices and disciplines within tertiary and doctoral programmes; because of these its changing nature provides sustainability, cause critique and improvements to an extent which is resilient to multiple external forces.
The article highlights some current developments of pedagogy as a stable, open-to-diversity and innovative theory to underpin the process of formal and informal education. The understanding of pedagogy in its meaning of teacher philosophy-in-use leads to a discussion of the constant and changing components of the definition. The intellectual tradition of pedagogy has become a phenomenon and notion to be compared and clarified in the context of another phenomenon – education sciences. The conclusions remind therefore the benefit of adopting the science of pedagogy being a theory and practice of formal education.
Reference43 articles.
1. Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511557675
2. The Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education. (2012). Assessment, Teaching, and Learning, 2(1)1.
3. Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2007). Wallace foundation distinguished lecture: What makes education research “educational”? Educational Researcher, 36(9), 529–540.10.3102/0013189X07312896
4. Bell, D. V. J. (2016). Twenty-first century education: Transformative education for sustainability and responsible citizenship. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 48–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2016-000410.1515/jtes-2016-0004
5. Blayone, T. (2017). Theorizing effective uses of digital technology with activity theory. (Unpublished article).
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. TOWARDS EDUCATION 2050: METHODOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS;SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference;2024-05-22
2. Possibilities of using the legacy of Turkic philosophers in the development of the professional personality of future teachers;Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University Series Physics;2024-02-01
3. Educational Science Traditions and Qualitative Research;Qualitative Inquiry in Education: Theory & Practice;2023-12-27
4. A More Sustainable Approach to Evaluating Teacher’s Work;Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability;2023-12-01
5. Higher Education Trends in Transforming the Teaching Experience;Student and Skilled Labour Mobility in the Asia Pacific Region;2023