Lateral intra-extraspinal cervical schwannomas: Partial versus total resection

Author:

Stefanović Ivan1,Bošnjaković Petar2,Kostić Aleksandar1,Stefanovic Stefan,Stojanov Dragan2,Dimov Desanka3,Radisavljević Miša1,Jelenković B.1

Affiliation:

1. 1Clinic of Neurosurgery, Clinical Centre Niš, University of Niš, Vojvode Stepe 22b, 18000, Nis, Serbia

2. 2Institute of Radiology, Clinical Centre Niš, University of Niš, Vojvode Stepe 22b, 18000, Nis, Serbia

3. 3Institute of Pathology, Clinical Centre Niš, University of Niš, Vojvode Stepe 22b, 18000, Nis, Serbia

Abstract

AbstractThe study involved 27 lateral cervical schwannomas surgically treated in the last 40 years utilizing either partial or total resection. The study aims to compare the results of total and partial resection of spinal lateral schwannoma and to assess the values of partial resection of large lateral cervical schwannomas. We performed a retrospective analysis of 27 patients operated for lateral cervical schwannomas in the period 1971–2010, out of which 11 had partial resection. The average follow-up of the patients was 136.4 months, comparing pre- and postoperative clinical picture, time to relapse, dynamics of yearly growth of schwannomas, and the need for re-resection. The average period of preoperative complaint in lateral cervical schwannomas was 19.6 months. Unilateral cervicobrachialgia as a manifestation of radiculopathy was observed in 85% of LCSs, and, was, as a rule the first symptom of the disease. Surgical treatment of 27 patients with LCSs resulted in recovery or improvement of complaints in 80% of cases. The treatment effect did not depend on the degree of resection. Reoperation was done, on average, 16.3 years after partial resection. The residues of lateral cervical schwannomas stopped growing 15 years after partial resection and underwent cystic degeneration. Partial resection of lateral cervical schwannomas is an excellent alternative to total resection, not only for the elderly or in cases of increased surgical risk, but also as a method of choice since it is more readily available to a larger number of surgeons and associated with low percentages of surgically relevant relapses and high percentages of improvement.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3