Geostrophic wind variability in the 50–60°N zone over Europe: the role of mid-troposphere atmospheric circulation macro-forms
Author:
Marosz Michał1, Kożuchowski Krzysztof2
Affiliation:
1. University of Gdańsk , Gdańsk Poland 2. Professor Emeritus, Gdańsk Poland
Abstract
Abstract
Circulation in the mid-troposphere in moderate and high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere can be characterised by the Vangenheim-Girs (VG) circulation macro-forms. The aim of the research was to analyse the VG macro-forms as a factor determining the general characteristics of the atmospheric circulation in mid-troposphere in the Euro-Atlantic region and low-troposphere airflow characteristics in the profile (zonal belt) crossing Central Europe from Ireland to Kazan in Russia (5°30’W–44°00’E). Alongside the VG macro-form calendar, ERA-INTERIM data were used. The utilised meteorological variables comprised 500hPa geopotential height, SLP and air temperature at 995 sigma level. The temporal scope of the research was 35 years (1981–2015) and the resolution was 24h (12.00 UTC). The circulation in the low-troposphere was characterised by the geostrophic wind vector characteristics directly resulting from SLP and air temperature fields. Subsequently, derived indices (e.g. wind direction stability) were used. The presented results indicate that the variability of anemological conditions at SLP in the area of 50–60°N over Europe is in direct connection with the mid-troposphere circulation features. The differences are statistically significant across nearly the entire research area. This includes the reversal of the dominant air flow direction in some areas. The greatest variability in geostrophic wind characteristics due to W, E and C VG macro-forms is revealed in the central and eastern part of the 50–60°N zone – between the southern Baltic Sea and the western border of Russia.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Geophysics,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference38 articles.
1. BARNSTON AG and LIVEZEY RE, 1987, Classification, seasonality and persistence of low-frequency atmospheric circulation patterns. Montly Weather Review 115: 1083–1126. 2. BIELEC-BĄKOWSKA Z, 2010, A classification of deep cyclones over Poland (1971–2000). Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 35: 491–497. 3. DEE DP, UPPALA SM, SIMMONS AJ, BERRISFORD P, POLI P, KOBAYASHI S, ANDRAE U, BALMASEDA MA, BALSAMO G, BAUER P, BECHTOLD P, BELJAARS ACM, VAN DE BERG L, BIDLOT J, BORMANN N, DELSOL C, DRAGANI R, FUENTES M, GEER AJ, HAIMBERGER L, HEALY SB, HERSBACH H, HÓLM EV, ISAKSEN L, KÅLLBERG P, KÖHLER M, MATRICARDI M, MCNALLY AP, MONGE-SANZ BM, MORCRETTE JJ, PARK K, PEUBEY C, DE ROSNAY P, TAVOLATO C, THÉPAUT JN and VITART F, 2011, The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Quarterly Journal of Royal Meteorological Society 137: 553–597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828 4. DEGIRMENDŽIĆ J, KOŻUCHOWSKI K and WIBIG J, 2000, Epoki cyrkulacyjne XX wieku i zmienność typów cyrkulacji atmosferycznej w Polsce. Przegląd Geofizyczny (45)3–4: 221–238. 5. DEGIRMENDŽIĆ J, KOŻUCHOWSKI K and ŻMUDZKA E, 2004, Changes of air temperature and precipitation in Poland in the period 1951–2000 and their relationship to atmospheric circulation, International Journal of Climatology 24: 291–310.
|
|