Legal and Organizational Framework for the use of Geoweb Methods for Public Participation in Spatial Planning in Poland: Experiences, Opinions and Challenges

Author:

Bąkowska-Waldmann Edyta1,Brudka Cezary2,Jankowski Piotr34

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management , Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań , Poland

2. Poznań University of Economics , Poznań , Poland

3. Department of Geography , San Diego State University , USA

4. Institute of Geoecology and Geoinformation , Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań , Poland

Abstract

Abstract Geoweb methods offer an alternative to commonly used public participation methods in spatial planning. This paper discusses two such geoweb methods – geo-questionnaire and geo-discussion in the context of their initial applications within the spatial planning processes in Poland. The paper presents legal and organizational framework for the implementation of methods, provides their development details, and assesses insights gained from their deployment in the context of spatial planning in Poland. The analysed case studies encompass different spatial scales ranging from major cities in Poland (Poznań and Łódź) to suburban municipalities (Rokietnica and Swarzędz in Poznań Agglomeration). The studies have been substantiated by interviews with urban planners and local authorities on the use and value of Geoweb methods in public consultations.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference39 articles.

1. Act of 27 March 2003 on spatial planning and management (Journal of Laws 2003 no. 80 item 717) (Ustawa z dnia 27 marca 2003 roku o planowaniu i zagospodarowaniu przestrzennym, Dz.U. 2003 Nr 80 poz. 717).

2. Anttiroiko A.-V., 2012. Urban Planning 2.0. International Journal of E-Planning Research 1(1): 16–30. DOI:10.4018/ijepr.2012010103.

3. Banyan M.E., 2007. Participation. In: Bevir M. (ed.), 2007. Encyclopedia of Governance. Sage Publications: 659–633.

4. Bishop J., 2007. Increasing participation in online communities: A framework for human–computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 1881–1893.

5. Brabham, D. C. 2009. “Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects.” Planning Theory 8 (3): 242–262. doi:10.1177/1473095209104824.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3