Affiliation:
1. University of Tokyo and eidos , the Centre for Metaphysics ( Geneva )
Abstract
Abstract
This paper will critically examine two solutions to Frege’s puzzle: the Millian-Russellian solution proposed by Salmon and Braun, which invokes non-semantic modes of presentation (guises, ways of believing or the like); and Fine’s relationalist solution, which appeals to semantic coordination. Special attention will be devoted to discussing the conception of modes of presentation as mental files and to elucidating the nature of coordination. A third solution to Frege’s puzzle will be explored which, like Salmon’s and Braun’s, adopts the Millian-Russellian semantics but, like Fine’s, involves coordination instead of modes of presentation; however, coordination will not be conceived as a semantic relation but as a cognitive and subjective relation, which provides no contribution to semantic content. This novel Millian-Russellian account involving cognitive coordination will be labelled cognitive relationism.
Reference51 articles.
1. Bonardi, Paolo. 2018. A farewell to the creatures of darkness. Manuscript.
2. Bonardi, Paolo. 2019. Manifest validity and beyond: an inquiry into the nature of coordination and the identity of guises and propositional-attitude states. Linguistics and Philosophy 42(5): 475–515.10.1007/s10988-018-9245-z
3. Bonardi, Paolo. 2020. Rational belief and dialetheism. Manuscript.10.1515/ip-2021-2016
4. Bonardi, Paolo. Forthcoming. Coordination, understanding, and semantic requirements. In Metaphysics, Meaning, and Modality: Themes from Kit Fine, ed. by M. Dumitru. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Braun, David. 1998. Understanding belief reports. Philosophical Review 107(4): 555–95.10.2307/2998375
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献