Abstract
Abstract
The paper shows that contextuals, words such as those discussed by Richard Vallée in his paper, “On local bars and imported beer”, include not only adjectives and nouns but also verbs, prepositions and adverbs. It shows, moreover, contextuals form just one subclass of words whose complements are optional, that is, words analogous to polyadic predicates of predicate logic. Just as different words, when their complements are omitted, give rise to reflexive (to wash), reciprocal (to meet) and indefinite (to eat) construals, so contextuals give rise to an indexical construal. The paper sets out how such optional complements, or polyadic predicates, as it were, can be handled completely with the syntax and semantics of English, without recourse to special pragmatic principles, lexical ambiguity or phonetically null elements. Though not discussed here, the approach nonetheless applies, it seems, to other languages, such as Chinese.
Reference29 articles.
1. Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz. 1935. “Die syntaktische konnexit¨at”. Studia Logica 1: 1–27. In Polish Logic: 1920–1939. [1967]. Translated by B. Grushman and edited by S. McCall. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 207–31.
2. Bach, Kent. 1994. “Semantic slack: what is said and more”. In Foundations of Speech Act Theory. S. L. Tsohatzidis (ed.). New York: Routledge: 267–91.
3. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua. 1953. “A quasi-arithmetical notation for syntactic description”. In Language 29: 47–58. (Reprinted in Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua. [1964]. Language and Information. Bar-Hillel (ed.). Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley: 61–74.)10.2307/410452
4. Bresnan, Joan. 1978. “A realistic transformational grammar”. In Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality. Morris Halle, Joan Bresnan, & George A. Miller (eds.). Cambridge, Mass. :The MIT Press: 1–59.
5. Carston, Robin. 1988 “Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics”. In Mental Representations: The interface between language and reality. R. M. Kempson (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 155–81.