Affiliation:
1. 1 University of Aberdeen
Abstract
Abstract
In Nothing to Come, Fabrice Correia and Sven Rosenkranz provide a sophisticated, compelling, and thoroughly defended account of the growing block theory. This note critically evaluates two aspects of this account. First, it evaluates Correia and Rosenkranz’s attempt at providing a grounding principle for future truths and argues that this principle fails to make progress in explaining why future truths are true. Second, it evaluates Correia and Rosenkranz’s construal of the open future arguing that the asymmetry in openness with respect to the past and future is not plausibly understood in terms of determinism and indeterminism, and in the final section, it evaluates their claim that a growing block theorist is able to maintain that the future is open in a stronger sense than the block theorist.
Reference9 articles.
1. Bigelow, John. 1996. “Presentism and properties”. Philosophical Perspectives 10: 35–52.
2. Correia, Fabrice and Rosenkranz, Sven. 2018. Nothing To Come: A Defence of the Growing Block Theory of Time. Synthese Library. Springer International Publishing.
3. Emery, Nina, Markosian, Ned, and Sullivan, Meghan. 2020. “Time”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, winter 2020 edition.
4. Lewis, David. 1979. “Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow”. Noûs 13(4):455–76.
5. Markosian, Ned. 1995. “The open past”. Philosophical Studies 79(1): 95–105.