Entomopathogenic Nematode Compatibility with Vineyard Fungicides
Author:
Campos-Herrera Raquel1, Carpentero Elizabeth1, Puelles Miguel1, Ramos Sáez de Ojer José Luis2, Blanco Pérez Rubén1
Affiliation:
1. Departamento de Viticultura , Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (CSIC, Gobierno de La Rioja, Universidad de La Rioja) , Finca La Grajera , Logroño , Spain 2. Servicio de Investigación Agraria y Sanidad Vegetal , Gobierno de La Rioja , Finca La Grajera , Logroño , Spain
Abstract
Abstract
Vineyards, covering over seven million hectares worldwide, hold significant socio-cultural importance. Traditionally reliant on conventional practices and agrochemicals, this agroecosystem faces environmental challenges, including soil and water pollution. Sustainable viticulture, driven by eco-friendly practices and cost reduction, has gained prominence, underlining the importance of biological control agents such as entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs). EPNs naturally occurr in vineyard soils and play a crucial role in controlling pest damage. Ensuring compatibility between EPNs and the commonly used vineyard fungicides is critical, as these applications constitute the predominant pest-management practice during the productive grapevine cycle.
This study assessed the impact of authorized grapevine fungicides on EPNs, focusing on the survival of populations and sublethal effects on their virulence. We investigated the compatibility of two EPN populations (Steinernema feltiae 107 and S. carpocapsae ‘All’) with three organic production-approved products (Bacillus pumilus, sulfur, and copper oxychloride) and two synthetic chemicals (Trifloxystrobin and Mancozeb). Our findings revealed that the viability of S. feltiae 107 was reduced when exposed to sulfur and copper oxychloride, and its virulence was affected by copper oxychloride and Mancozeb, although only two days after exposure and with no significant differences for larval mortality at five days.
In contrast, S. carpocapsae ‘All’ exhibited full compatibility with all five fungicides, with no impact on its viability or virulence. Consequently, our results suggested that the evaluated fungicides could be co-applied on both EPN populations if they were employed on the same day. However, further research on multi-target interactions is needed to ensure the successful implementation of this kind of co-application.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference45 articles.
1. Acevedo, J.P.M., Samuels, R.I., Machado, I.R. and Dolinski, C. 2007. Interactions between isolates of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae and the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora JPM4 during infection of the sugar cane borer Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 96:187–92. 2. Barzman, M., Bàrberi, P., Birch, A.N.E., Boonekamp, P., Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S., Graf, B., Hommel, B., Jensen, J.E., Kiss, J., Kudsk, P., Lamichhane, J.R., Messéan, A., Moonen, A.C., Ratnadass, A., Ricci, P., Sarah, J.L., and Sattin, M. 2015. Eight principles of integrated pest management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35:1199–1215. 3. Blanco-Pérez, R., Sáenz-Romo, M.G., Vicente-Díez, I., Ibáñez-Pascual, S., Martínez-Villar, E., Marco-Mancebón, V.S., Pérez-Moreno, I., and Campos-Herrera, R. 2020. Impact of vineyard ground cover management on the occurrence and activity of entomopathogenic nematodes and associated soil organisms. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment 301:107028. 4. Blanco-Pérez, R., Vicente-Díez, I., Ramos-Sáenz de Ojer, J.L., Marco-Mancebón, V.S., Pérez-Moreno, I., and Campos-Herrera, R. 2022. Organic viticulture enhanced the activity of native entomopathogenic nematodes in DOCa Rioja soils (North of Spain). Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment 332:107931. 5. Bode, H.B. 2009. Entomopathogenic bacteria as a source of secondary metabolites. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 13:224–230.
|
|