Abstract
Abstract
Although a substantial part of the body of laws of an EU Member State is founded upon European Union law and norms, the number of preliminary questions emanating from courts in the Czech Republic appears to be disproportionately low compared to other similar EU Member States. The aim of this article is to analyse and outline possible reasons for the lack of preliminary questions coming from the Czech Republic. In her analysis, the author identifies three possible factors underpinning the issue. These factors include attitudes towards the EU and a general lack of understanding of the relevance of EU laws and norms; the role of preliminary rulings; and the perception and recognition of courts. An integral part of this analysis is a critical commentary on the shifts in how courts and tribunals are perceived within the meaning of Art. 267 TFEU. Lastly, the author offers guidance to fellow legal professionals and academics for interpreting EU norms.
Reference44 articles.
1. Lisa O’ Carroll, ‘UK government finds extra 1,400 laws to scrap under Rees-Mogg’s Brexit bill’ (The Guardian, 8 November 2022)
2. Petra Bárd, ‘An Analysis of the CJEU decision C-564/19 IS,’ (Verfblog, 26 November 2021)
3. Ágoston Mohay, Á and István Szijártó, ‘Criminal procedures, preliminary references and judicial independence: A balancing act? Case C-564/19 IS.’ (2022) 29 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 629–640
4. Vivien Judith Rose, Lady Rose of Colmworth, DBE, 1966 and All That: Changing Our Minds in a Post-Brexit World. at King’s College London, 23 May 2022 < https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/ukael-lady-rose-speech-23-May-2022.pdf>
5. Natalia Dřínovská and Zuzana Vikarská. Evropská zletilost českých (nejvyšších) soudů aneb prvních 18 let předběžných otázek z Brna. (2023) 31 Časopis pro pravní vědu a praxi 9–45.