Splitting of Corporate Taxes in Germany and Formulaic Distribution of a CCCTB – Critical Comparison

Author:

Müller-Thomczik Sandra1,Reiter Lukas1

Affiliation:

1. Fern Universität Hagen , Faculty of Business Administration and Economics , Universitätsstr. 41 , Hagen , Germany

Abstract

Abstract The introduction of a formulaically apportioned common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB) could represent a milestone in international taxation. No agreement has yet been reached, however. In contrast, Germany already has a long-standing system that apportions corporate taxes by splitting trade tax and corporate income tax. This conceptual study, presented at the European Accounting Association (EAA) Congress in Bergen in 2022, will examine whether the German method of splitting could lead to some lessons for an appropriate design for an international profit distribution formula. Methodologically, we use a two-step approach: First, we compare the designs, and then we juxtapose both on a factual level. Next, we ask what the objectives these mechanisms have; do they even coincide? If the goals are not comparable, one cannot indisputably serve as a model for the other. We determine that, even though there are partial deviations, a closer look reveals significant overlaps; however, the German implementation is far from consistent and prioritises practicability. This leads us to our main result: The German system makes a clear value decision towards practicability, although there is a different set of aims. For the implementation of formulaic EU profit sharing, the lesson to be learned is that practicability should play a central role in the design of the formula. This lesson is important and helpful to accompany and support the implementation process in the EU.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference65 articles.

1. Agúndez-García, A. (2006). The Delineation and Apportionment of an EU Consolidated Tax Base for Multi-jurisdictional Corporate Income Taxation: A Review of Issues and Options. Taxation Papers No 9.

2. Bahn, D. (2016). Einwirkungsmöglichkeiten der Kommunen bei der Gewerbesteuer. Bestehende Rechte und praktische Vorteile. Neue Wirtschafts-Briefe, 18, 1367–1372.

3. Baldauf, S. (2022). §§ 29, 31, 33 GewStG. In B. Heuermann, P. Brandis (Eds.), EStG KStG GewStG – Kommentar (161th supplement 2021). München: Vahlen.

4. Bergemann, A., & Wingler, J. (2012). Kommentar Gewerbesteuer. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

5. Bökelmann, J. (1997). Gewinnzurechnung im Körperschaftssteuerrecht. Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3