Affiliation:
1. Poznan University of Life Sciences , Faculty of Economics , Wojska Polskiego St. 28 , Poznań , Poland
Abstract
Abstract
Negative effects of globalisation and liberalisation of trade are countered using protectionist measures. Contemporary protectionism, typically termed neoprotectionism, is put into practice using a wide variety of non-tariff instruments, with a considerably lesser degree of transparency compared to tariffs, which are more difficult to identify and measure. The aim of this paper is to determine the dynamics of protection, as well as the category and geographical structure for the use of trade policy instruments in the world goods trade in the years 2010–2022. The study was based on source materials from the Global Trade Alert (GTA) and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). The conducted analyses showed that interventions taken in the world goods trade in the years 2010–2022 were primarily trade restrictions executed using non-tariff measures. In terms of its geographical distribution the relatively greatest scope of protectionism observed was for the trade policy of China and the USA. In terms of the product category, the sale of agricultural produce was protected the most. The realised model of protectionism differed depending on the group of products being traded, the standard of economic development of the country implementing trade policy measures, its export specialisation and the degree of self-sufficiency. The protectionist character of the trade policy was also enhanced during economic crises.
Reference45 articles.
1. Aisbett, E., & Pearson, L. M. (2012). Environmental and Health Protections, or New Protectionism? Determinants of SPS Notifications by WTO Members (Research Paper No. 12–13). Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
2. Baena-Rojas, J. J., & Londoño Pineda, A. A. (2020). Tariff Barriers and Non-Tariff Barriers: Appraising Columbia‘s Protectionism. World Customs Journal, 14(1), 71–93
3. Bhagwati, J. (1995). Trade Liberalisation and ‘Fair Trade’ Demands: Addressing the Environmental and Labour Standards Issues. World Economy, 18(6), 745–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.1995.tb00329.x
4. Bhagwati, J., & Srinivasan, T. N. (1996). Trade and the environment: Does Environmental Diversity Detract from the Case for Free Trade? In J. Bhagwati & R. E. Hudec (Eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade? Vol. 1. MIT Press.
5. Bown, C. P. (2010). Taking Stock of Antidumping, Safeguards, and Countervailing Duties, 1990–2009 (Research Working Paper No. 5436). World Bank, Trade and Integration Team, Development Research Group.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献