Affiliation:
1. Institute of Economic Education, School of Business & Economics , University of Münster , Münster , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
In the process of drafting European Union (EU) legislation and supervising its effective national implementation, the European Commission has to cooperate with lobbyists. This exchange involves the risk of arbitrary lobby influence on its decisions at the expense of other EU citizens. Against this backdrop, this article addresses the research question of which normative principles should constrain the Commission’s interaction with lobbyists. Based on the contractarian approach from Rawls’ Law of Peoples, it identifies eight criteria of a Rawlsian lobby consultation system for the Commission, which representatives of EU countries could accept from behind a Rawlsian veil of ignorance and in view of the fundamental interest of their people. These normative criteria can be supervised by independent institutions like the European Parliament and the European Court of Justice. They constitute a procedural approach to the political supervision of the Commission’s interaction with lobbyists that can be enforced without compromising its necessary institutional independence.
Reference45 articles.
1. Anastasiadis, Stephanos (2007). Cars, Climate Change and Lobbying the European Union: Lessons for CSR and Sustainability. CSR Paper 30.2007, 1-32.
2. Anastasiadis, Stephanos (2014), Toward A View of Citizenship and Lobbying: Corporate Engagement in the Political Process, Business & Society, Vol. 53(2), 260-299.
3. Anastasiadis, Stephanos; Moon, Jeremy; Michael Humphreys (2018), Lobbying and the Responsible Firm: Agenda-Setting for a Freshly Conceptualized Field, Business Ethics: A European Review, 1–15. doi: 10.1111/beer.12180.
4. Bauer, Theresa (2014), Responsible Lobbying: A Multidimensional Model, The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Vol. 53, 61-67.
5. Bauer, Theresa (2016), Responsible Lobbying: An Empirical Study in the EU, Annals in Social Responsibility, Vol. 2(1), 63-82.