Reflecting on the Efficiency of Design Thinking and Lean Startup

Author:

Bätz Kerstin1ORCID,Siegfried Patrick1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ISM International School of Management , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Objective: In this article, the methods used to simplify the business modelling and founding of new companies are presented and critically reflected. Furthermore, it is discussed to what extent a specific method is advantageous, disadvantageous, applicable, not applicable, or even contradictory. Methodology: The theoretical analysis is underpinned by a qualitative interview study asking company founders about applying the methods mentioned above. The work is based on scientific papers and books and is complemented by the data originating from a specially designed study. Findings: The results conclude that business model founding instruments provide strategic guidelines favouring entrepreneurs, yet they turn out to be minor in its real-life significance as numerous factors rooted in different fields of expertise play in. Value Added: The added value of this paper is in the elaboration of efficiency bringing and risk-minimizing components of the methods, respectively. Accordingly, managers and entrepreneurs of all industries are intended to be equipped with sufficient information content that eases the decision for or against one of the methods as realistic expectations considering the application are likely to emerge. Recommendations: The limitations of this study are rooted in the chosen qualitative research since every interviewee is a subject to their individual perception.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference100 articles.

1. 4investors (2020). Warum so viele Startups scheitern! Retrieved from https://www.4investors.de/nachrichten/boerse.php?sektion=stock&ID=145726. Access: 18.02.2021.

2. Alpar, A., Koczy, M., & Metzen, M. (2015). SEO – Strategie, Taktik und Technik: Online-Marketing mittels effektiver Suchmaschinenoptimierung. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.10.1007/978-3-658-02235-8

3. Bain, & Company (2020). Coronavirus Insights. Retrieved from https://www.bain.com/insights/topics/coronavirus/. Access: 27.01.2021.

4. Bain, & Company (2021). The Future of Luxury: Bouncing Back from Covid-19. Retrieved from https://www.bain.com/insights/the-future-of-luxury-bouncing-back-from-covid-19/. Access: 12.02.2021.

5. Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2018). Business Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3