Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison

Published:2020-01-01 Issue:1 Volume:24 Page:454-471
ISSN:2255-8837
Container-title:Environmental and Climate Technologies
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Zlaugotne Beate¹,Zihare Lauma¹,Balode Lauma¹,Kalnbalkite Antra¹,Khabdullin Aset²,Blumberga Dagnija¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Energy Systems and Environment , Riga Technical University , Azenes iela 12/1 , Riga , LV-1048 , Latvia

2. Rudny Industrial Institute , 50 let Oktyabrya street 38 , Rudny , 111500, Republic of Kazakhstan

Abstract

Abstract Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is widely used to solve various decision problems through alternative evaluation. MCDA methods can be used in every field that can define a problem, alternatives and criteria. However, finding the appropriate method can influence the results, in this research five MCDA methods have been tested on the renewable energy sector in Latvia to find the best alternative. The main results showed that TOPSIS, VIKOR and PROMETHEE-GAIA have similar priority selection and the highest ranking was selected for hydropower plant, but MULTIMOORA and COPRAS results were beneficial to Solar PV.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Environmental Science,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Link

https://www.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0028

Reference30 articles.

1. [1] Langemeyer J., Gomez-Baggethun E., Haase D., Scheuer S., Elmqvist T. Bridging the gap between ecosystem service assessments and land-use planning through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Environmental Science & Policy 2016:62:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.01310.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.013

2. [2] Ishizaka A., Nemery P. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.10.1002/9781118644898

3. [3] Yazdani M., Payam A. F. A comparative study on material selection of microelectromechanical systems electrostatic actuators using Ashby, VIKOR and TOPSIS. Materials & Design 2015:65:328–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.00410.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.004

4. [4] Debbarma B., Chakraborti P., Bose P. K., Deb M., Banerjee R. Exploration of PROMETHEE II and VIKOR methodology in a MCDM approach for ascertaining the optimal performance-emission trade-off vantage in a hydrogen-biohol dual fuel endeavour. Fuel 2017:210:922–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.01610.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.016

5. [5] Chen Y., Ran Y., Wang Z., Li X., Yang X., Zhang G. An extended MULTIMOORA method based on OWGA operator and Choquet integral for risk prioritization identification of failure modes. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2020:91:103605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.10360510.1016/j.engappai.2020.103605

Cited by 68 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The conceptual quantitative assessment framework for Nature-based Solutions (NbS);Nature-Based Solutions;2024-12

2. Environmental evaluation and comparison of hybrid separation methods based on distillation and pervaporation for dehydration of binary alcohol mixtures with life cycle, PESTLE, and multi-criteria decision analyses;Separation and Purification Technology;2024-11

3. A multi-dimensional sensitivity analysis approach for evaluating the robustness of renewable energy sources in European countries;Journal of Cleaner Production;2024-09

4. PySensMCDA: A novel tool for sensitivity analysis in multi-criteria problems;SoftwareX;2024-09

5. An approach for evaluation of the spent nuclear fuel management strategy for Brazilian nuclear power plants based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methodology;Nuclear Engineering and Design;2024-08