Author:
Perez-Bezos Silvia,Grijalba Olatz,Hernandez-Minguillon Rufino Javier
Abstract
Abstract
The influence of people on building performance is becoming increasingly significant. Including users’ perspective in decision-making and design processes could help to improve occupants’ well-being and the feasibility of interventions by providing more accurate information about heating preferences for energy models. Furthermore, understanding residents’ level of thermal satisfaction could enable more appropriate measures to be taken to improve the energy efficiency of buildings. This study aims to define an indicator that measures the level of thermal satisfaction of social housing occupants so that it can be contrasted with other methods of analysis of perceived comfort and can be replicated in different building contexts. A way to analyse occupants’ thermal satisfaction is proposed in a quantitative way, measured as the difference of the desired temperature and the perceived indoor temperature. The index was applied to a sample of 283 social housing dwellings in the Basque Country, Spain, with data obtained via surveys that include questions on thermal comfort in winter and households’ characteristics. Furthermore, the indicator was compared to other variables, such as household income and energy expenses, to observe behavioural trends and possible cases of energy vulnerability. The obtained variable provides occupants’ opinion and perception to ensure the suitability of the solutions for improving the energy efficiency of the building and the thermal comfort. It is also possible to apply it to different building typologies and compare the results with other models of perceived thermal comfort.
Subject
General Environmental Science,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference20 articles.
1. European Commission Directorate-General for Energy. Comprehensive study of building energy renovation activities and the uptake of nearly zero-energy buildings in the EU : final report. Publications Office, 2019. [Online]. [Accessed: 13.03.2023]. Available: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2833
2. Laktuka K., Pakere I., Lauka D., Blumberga D., Volkova A. Long-term policy recommendations for improving the efficiency of heating and cooling. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2021:25(1):392–404. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0029
3. Oregi X., Hernandez P., Hernandez R. Analysis of life-cycle boundaries for environmental and economic assessment of building energy refurbishment projects. Energy Build. 2017:136:12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.057
4. Motuzienė V., Lapinskienė V., Rynkun G., Bielskus J. Energy Performance Gap Analysis in Energy Efficient Residential Buildings in Lithuania. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2021:25(1):610–620. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0045
5. Etxebarria M., Oregi X., Grijalba O., Hernández R. J. Relationship between energy demand, indoor thermal behaviour and temperature-related health risk concerning passive energy refurbishment interventions. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2020:24(2):348–363. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0078
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献