Affiliation:
1. Institute of Energy Systems and Environment , Riga Technical University , 12/1 Azenes iela, Riga, LV-1048 , Latvia
Abstract
Abstract
Latvia’s wood industry is based mainly on three product groups – fuelwood, wood-based panels and furniture. This research adopts the TIMES modelling approach to assess the potential of forestry resources’ contribution to the development of bioeconomy by evaluating different existing and new products. The modelling approach is commonly used for energy systems, however, the study shows the adaptation of TIMES for the forestry sector from the perspective of bioeconomy development analysis, considering wood resource demand in the energy sector and the benefits of higher added value product production. The aim of modelling is to find which are more economically feasible exploitation options and the optimal production amounts for wood and wood by-products, such as biofuels, xylan, and lyocell. The study results show that the potential production of new products with higher added value is compatible with currently existing wood demand trends of three main product groups. The result shows that the lyocell biorefinery scenario has the potential for adding 199.5 million euros to Latvia’s GDP and helps achieve a 30 % increase in the added value of forestry resource use by 2030. To achieve the target, only 140 thousand tons (1.3 %) of total processed wood (total wood commodity is equal to 11 139 thousand tons) is used for lyocell biorefinery due to the high added value of the new product. Despite the various limitations of the model, the obtained results suggest that producing higher added-value products from forestry resources should be considered as a significant long-term supplementary driver of economic growth and bioeconomy development.
Subject
General Environmental Science,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference86 articles.
1. [1] Morone P. Sustainability transition towards a bio-based economy. Sustainability 2018:10(8):2631. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1008263110.3390/su10082631
2. [2] Gravelsins A., et al. Economic analysis of wood products: System dynamics approach. Energy Procedia 2017:128:431–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.02310.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.023
3. [3] Schultmann F., Rudi A. Quantitative assessment of regional biomass-based value chains [Online]. [Accessed 06.07.2021.] Available: https://biooekonomie-bw.uni-hohenheim.de/en/tp116
4. [4] UFZ Bioenergy Department. Assessment tools for sustainability monitoring of bioeconomy networks (sustainability monitoring tool SUMINISTRO). 2017 [Online]. [Accessed 02.04.2022]. Available: https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=38506
5. [5] European Commission . EU Bioeconomy Monitoring System [Online]. [Accessed 02.04.2022]. Available: https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/bioeconomy/monitoring_en
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献