Abstract
AbstractThe Pinus mugo complex comprises closely related pines in different taxonomic ranks, which commonly occur in major European mountain chains. This large and polymorphic complex has been, and still is, a considerable challenge for taxonomists due to highly variable phenotypical characteristics within particular taxa, ongoing hybridization in sympatric populations, lack of distinct morphological species-specific determinants, and the absence of distinct genetic differentiation among them. Moreover, cytogenetic data on pines from this complex are very scarce. Therefore, in this study, we used C-banding methods and flow cytometric analysis in order to provide new data on karyotypical features and DNA content of three closely-related pines from the Pinus mugo complex, i.e., Pinus mugo (Turra), Pinus uliginosa (Neumann), and Pinus × rhaetica (Brügger) and to gain more insight into the taxonomic relationships between these pines. Our results confirmed that the basic number of chromosome is the same amongst the analyzed taxa (2n = 2x = 24), and that the karyotypes have a similar morphology. The number of secondary constrictions (SCs) and C-banding patterns differed slightly between P. mugo, P. uliginosa and P. × rhaetica. The nuclear DNA content (2C/pg) among analyzed taxa is from 46.41 pg for P. mugo and P. × rhaetica to 46.48 pg for P. uliginosa. For each of these pines, certain taxa-specific cytogenetic determinants were identified. Our results indicate that they may represent two different taxa, and so their names should not be used interchangeably in scientific literature.
Funder
Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wy?szego
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cell Biology,Plant Science,Genetics,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Biochemistry,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference26 articles.
1. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ (2011) Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: targets, trends and tomorrow. Ann Bot 107:467–590. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq258
2. Bogunić F, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Muratović E, Pustahija F, Medjedović S (2011) Molecular cytogenetics and flow cytometry reveal conserved genome organization in Pinus mugo and P. uncinata. Ann For Sci 68:179–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-011-0019-9
3. Bonikowski R, Celiński K, Wojnicka-Półtorak A, Maliński T (2015) Composition of essential oils isolated from the needles of P. uncinata Ramond ex. Mirb. And P. uliginosa Neumann ex Wimmer grown in Poland. Nat Prod Commun 10:371–373
4. Boratyńska K, Boratyński A (2007) Taxonomic differences among closely related pines Pinus sylvestris, P. mugo, P. uncinata, P. rotundata and P. uliginosa as revelated in needle sclerenchyma cells. Flora 202:555–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2006.11.004
5. Celiński K, Bonikowski R, Wojnicka-Półtorak A, Chudzińska E, Maliński T (2015) Volatiles as chemosystematic markers for distinguishing closely related species within the Pinus mugo complex. Chem Biodivers 12:1208–1213. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.201400253
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献