Affiliation:
1. Lecturer PhD., “George Enescu” National University of Arts, Iași , Romania
Abstract
Abstract
In the music higher education, the appearance of a concept of incompatibility between the performance practice and the studentsʼ theoretical and analytical training is a phenomenon with multiple consequences on their training, on the way of organizing a curriculum and a hierarchical deformed attitude on the different subjects in the curriculum.This study summarizes some of the arguments that emphasize the role played by the study of the Music Analysis in developing the musicianʼs ability to understand music from the perspective of the compositional conception, to discover its importance as a stage in the formation of an original performance concept while highlighting the advantages of a collaborative approach between the two areas of training of the musician.
Reference15 articles.
1. 1. Aiello, R., Williamon, A. (2002). Memory. In R. Parncutt, &G.McPherson (Eds.), The Science and psychology of music performance:Creative strategies for teaching and learning (167-181). Oxford:Oxford University Press10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195138108.003.0011
2. 2. Bowen J.A. (1993). The History of Remembered Innovation: Tradition and its Role in the Relationship between Musical Works and Their Performances. The Journal of Musicology, 11(2), 139-17310.2307/764028
3. 3. Bowen, J.A. (1996). Performance Practice Versus Performance Analysis: Why Should Performers Study Performance, Performance Practice Review, 9(1), DOI: 10.5642/perfpr.199609.01.0310.5642/perfpr.199609.01.03
4. 4. Cook, N. (1999). Analysing Performance and Performing Analysis, in Cook, N., & Everist, M. (1999). Rethinking Music, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 239-261
5. 5. Cook, N. (2001). Product or Process? Music and Performance, Music Theory Online 7 (http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.01.7.2/toc.7.2.html)