Research on the Reform Path of Curriculum Civics Integrating into Online Learning Teaching and Learning for Law Majors in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

Author:

Wan Hui1

Affiliation:

1. Wuhan Business University , Wuhan , Hubei , , China .

Abstract

Abstract With the rapid development of information technology, online learning of legal specialty in the era of artificial intelligence has become a significant trend. This study explores the pedagogical reform path of integrating course ideology into online learning for law majors. Multiple linear regression models and Apriori association rule algorithms were used to analyze the learning effects of 457 law students. The integration of the course Civics and Politics significantly impacted students’ learning outcomes, especially showing significant differences among students of different genders and grades. Different genders showed significant differences (p<0.05) in course teaching integration and faculty. Significant differences were also observed among students of various grades regarding integration of course materials, teaching, and teacher team integration. The Pearson product-difference correlation analysis of the variables of course civics integration into law teaching found that talent cultivation goal integration, course textbook integration, course teaching integration, and teacher team had significant positive correlations with learning outcomes. These findings were further validated by the association rules mined by the Apriori algorithm. The student learning outcomes are more likely to achieve excellence when the scores for course material integration and teaching integration are high. This study provides an effective pedagogical reform path for integrating civics into online learning for law majors, which significantly enhances students’ learning effects.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference18 articles.

1. Hakimi, M. J., & Jensen, E. G. (2019). Rethinking legal education in afghanistan: the law program at the american university of afghanistan. Stanford Journal of International Law, 55.

2. Silverman, S. (2021). Key directions in legal education: national and international perspectives. Law library journal(1), 113.

3. Kaczorowski, Robert, & J. (2018). Fordham university school of law: a case study of legal education in twentieth-century america. Fordham Law Review.

4. Zelechoski, A. D., Romaine, C. L. R., & Wolbransky, M. (2017). Teaching psychology and law: an empirical evaluation of experiential learning. Teaching of Psychology, 44(3), 009862831771131.

5. Saraiva, R., Bertoldo, G., Bjrndal, L. D., Bunghez, C., Lofthus, I. S., & Mcgill, L., et al. (2022). Improving the evaluation of eyewitness evidence in legal decision‐making: testing an active versus passive teaching aid. Applied cognitive psychology(3), 36.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3