A game theory-based pricing model for ancillary services in electricity markets
Author:
Wu Yang1, Meng Xinyu2, Chen Yuguo2, Kou Wenxin2, Zhang Jian2, Xie Yigong1, Zhu Xinchun1, Liu Shuangquan1
Affiliation:
1. Yunnan Power Dispatching and Concenter , Kunming , Yunnan , , China . 2. Beijing TsItergy Technology Co., Ltd , Beijing , , China .
Abstract
Abstract
Amidst the ongoing evolution and substantial reforms within the electric power market, the development of an auxiliary service pricing model grounded in game theory emerges as crucial. This study delineates the construction of an electricity auxiliary service pricing model, utilizing a dual mechanism approach: a cooperative game-based electricity price formation mechanism and a Stackelberg game-based time-sharing pricing mechanism. Furthermore, it incorporates demand response technology to conduct a detailed analysis of optimization results and the applicability of the proposed electricity service pricing model. The pricing scheme designated as Scheme 4, derived from the proposed model, demonstrates notable superiority in terms of economic efficiency and environmental sustainability when juxtaposed with three alternative schemes. Specifically, Scheme 4 yields a net profit of $13,267.6, achieves clean energy utilization amounting to 89.67 MWh, and minimizes wind abandonment to 17.35 MWh, outperforming all other considered scenarios in these metrics. Operational analysis reveals that the model's execution time varies between 15 and 50 seconds across different sample sizes, exhibiting minimal fluctuations. Additionally, the Monte Carlo simulations consistently produce values inferior to the objective function value of the developed model, with the discrepancy narrowing from 38 to 20, indicating the model's robust adaptability.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference21 articles.
1. Hu, Z., Bi, X., Wang, K., Hu, H., & Guo, X. (2019). Design of peak regulation auxiliary service market for east china power grid to promote inter-provincial sharing of negative reserve. Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems, 43(5), 175-182. 2. Pollitt, M. G., & Richter, L. L. (2018). Which smart electricity service contracts will consumers accept? the demand for compensation in a platform market. Energy economics(72-May). 3. Jang, H., Moon, S., & Kim, J. (2024). Effects of time-of-use pricing for residential customers and wholesale market consequences in south korea. Energy Economics, 134. 4. Xiao, X., Wang, J. X., & Hill, D. J. (2022). Impact of large-scale concentrated solar power on energy and auxiliary markets. Applied Energy, 318. 5. Alma, H., & Karan, M. B. (2017). Valuations of electricity distribution and retail companies in an emerging market. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 11(2), 329-349.
|
|