Affiliation:
1. Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology , Xi’an , Shaanxi , , China .
2. Huaqing College of Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology , Xi’an , Shaanxi , , China .
Abstract
Abstract
As a crucial pillar of the national economy, the healthy and stable development of the construction industry provides strong support to the national economy. In the current developmental context, it is particularly important to address the relationship between growth and low-carbon emission reduction. This paper proposes a study of carbon emissions from buildings using the CRISP-DM framework. According to the current situation of carbon emissions from building construction, data on the building stage is obtained from two parts: prefabricated works and on-site pouring. Because the original list data of engineering materials is partially missing, the data is processed by the weighted average method for each building material usage and carbon emission to avoid affecting the analysis results of the overall data. Combining the carbon emission measurement formula, carbon emission factor, and CRISP-DM, the carbon emission measurement model for buildingization is constructed using CRISP-DM. According to the model, the carbon emission in the transportation phase of prefabricated building materials is 1039925.978 kgCO2e, and the carbon emission of C30 concrete is the largest, with a value of 510,156.027 kgCO2e. In addition, the carbon emission in the transportation phase of cast-in-place building materials is 180.812 kgCO2e, of which the largest carbon emission is crushed stone (85.007 kgCO2e). This study can provide a reference for the construction industry in each province to set the carbon emission reduction target according to the local conditions, which is of practical significance to promote the low-carbon development of building construction.
Reference26 articles.
1. Hackett, D. (2017). The carbon emissions from building islands. New scientist(3120), 234.
2. Patricia González-Vallejo, Muntean, R., Jaime Solís-Guzmán, & Marrero, M. (2020). Carbon footprint of dwelling construction in romania and spain. a comparative analysis with the oerco2 tool. Sustainability, 12.
3. Habib, S., Marimuthu, P. N., & Zaeri, N. (2015). Carbon-aware enterprise network through redesign. Computer Journal, 58(2), 234-245.
4. Leung, T., M., Chau, C., & K., et al. (2015). A review on life cycle assessment, life cycle energy assessment and life cycle carbon emissions assessment on buildings. Applied Energy.
5. José D. Silvestre, Pargana, N., Brito, J. D., Pinheiro, M. D., & Duro, V. (2016). Insulation cork boards— environmental life cycle assessment of an organic construction material. Materials, 9(5), 394.